Apache Flink vs. StreamSets DataOps Platform

In well-suited scenarios, I would recommend using Apache Flink when you need to perform real-time analytics on streaming data, such as monitoring user activities, analyzing IoT device data, or processing financial transactions in real-time. It is also a good choice in scenarios where fault tolerance and consistency are crucial. I would not recommend it for simple batch processing pipelines or for teams that aren't experienced, as it might be overkill, and the steep learning curve may not justify the investment.

Incentivized

Majorly for all Batch and Streaming Scenarios we are designing StreamSets pipelines, few best suited and tried out use cases below : 1. JDBC to ADLS data transfer based on source refresh frequency. 2. Kafka to GCS. 3. Kafka to Azure Event. 4. Hub HDFS to ADLS data transfer. 5. Schema generation to generate Avro. The easy to design Canvas, Scheduling Jobs, Fragment creation and utilization, an inbuilt wide range of Stage availability makes it an even more favorable tool for me to design data engineering pipelines.

Incentivized

• Low latency Stream Processing, enabling real-time analytics
• Scalability, due its great parallel capabilities
• Stateful Processing, providing several built-in fault tolerance systems
• Flexibility, supporting both batch and stream processing

Incentivized

• A easy to use canvas to create Data Engineering Pipeline.
• A wide range of available Stages ie. Sources, Processors, Executors, and Destinations.
• Supports both Batch and Streaming Pipelines.
• Scheduling is way easier than cron.
• Integration with Key-Vaults for Secrets Fetching.

Incentivized

• Python/SQL API, since both are relatively new, still misses a few features in comparison with the Java/Scala option
• Steep Learning Curve, it's documentation could be improved to something more user-friendly, and it could also discuss more theoretical concepts than just coding
• Community smaller than other frameworks

Incentivized

• Monitoring/Visualization can be improvised and enhanced a lot (e.g. to monitor a Job to see what happened 7 days back with data transfer).
• The logging mechanism can be simplified (Logs can be filtered with "ERROR", "DEBUG", "ALL" etc but still takes some time to get familiar for understanding).
• Auto Scalability for heavy load transfer (Taking much time for >5 million record transfer from JDBC to ADLS destination in Avro file transfer).
• There should be a concept of creating Global variables which is missing.

Incentivized

Apache Spark is more user-friendly and features higher-level APIs. However, it was initially built for batch processing and only more recently gained streaming capabilities. In contrast, Apache Flink processes streaming data natively. Therefore, in terms of low latency and fault tolerance, Apache Flink takes the lead. However, Spark has a larger community and a decidedly lower learning curve.

Incentivized

StreamSets is a one-stop solution to design Data engineering Pipelines and doesn't require deep Programming knowledge, It's so user-friendly that anyone in Team can contribute to the Idea of pipeline design. In Hadoop One has to be programming proficient to use its various components like Hive, HDFS, Kafka, etc but in StreamSets all these stages are built-in and ready to use with minor configuration.

Incentivized

• Allowed for real-time data recovery, adding significant value to the busines
• Enabled us to create new internal tools that we couldn't find in the market, becoming a strategic asset for the business
• Enhanced the overall technical capability of the team

Incentivized

• Simplified Improvised Overall data ingestion and Integration Process.
• Support to various Hetrogenous Source systems like RDBMS< Kafka, Salesforce, Key Vault.
• Secure, easy to launch Integration tool.

Incentivized