Apptio Cloudability vs. Spot by NetApp

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apptio Cloudability
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Cloudability from Apptio, an IBM Company, is a cloud cost management and optimization tool that enables IT, finance, and business teams to optimize their costs and communicate the business value of the cloud.N/A
Spot by NetApp
Score 6.4 out of 10
N/A
Spot by NetApp, now including CloudCheckr, helps companies to run their cloud investments. The Spot product suite uses machine learning and analytics to automate and optimize cloud infrastructure, to ensure that workloads and applications always have the best possible infrastructure that is available, scalable and available at the lowest possible cost. Spot’s technology provides insights into cloud costs, recommendations for how to optimize utilization and costs, and automation to implement…N/A
Pricing
Apptio CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apptio CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apptio CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Considered Both Products
Apptio Cloudability
Chose Apptio Cloudability
Apptio Cloudability was evaluated as the one that met the most requirements during a comparative evaluation we performed
Chose Apptio Cloudability
I have used CloudHealth, CloudCheckr (since acquired by Spot) and Pileus (now Anodot) are prior companies.

CloudHealth is really the only tool that compares well with Apptio Cloudability. CloudCheckr has a very clunky UI and is totally absent of Business Mapping features. Anodot
Chose Apptio Cloudability
Cloudability has more calculated fields for the CUR information, simplifying the reporting process. The performance of the tool for dashboarding and reporting is much faster as well as far more flexible. Being able to easily create reports and surface them to users with a few …
Chose Apptio Cloudability
We found that Apptio Cloudability fit our use cases from reporting to dashboards from the visibility point of view. We really liked the Views functionality which made it easy to customize different business and account segments. We selected this because our users were familiar …
Chose Apptio Cloudability
Please see previous comments
Spot by NetApp
Chose Spot by NetApp
Cloudability boasts great visualizations but lacks the ability to customize reports and does not address any aspects of cloud management other than cost. CloudHealth is a viable competitor to CloudCheckr. CloudHealth does not have the breadth of reporting capabilities but …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Apptio CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
Apptio Cloudability
-
Ratings
Spot by NetApp
9.0
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Cloud Management Security00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Cost Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Governance and Compliance00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Systems Integration00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apptio CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.5 out of 10
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apptio CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(78 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(78 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.2
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apptio CloudabilitySpot by NetApp
Likelihood to Recommend
Apptio, an IBM Company
I think if you are maybe small in your cloud spend and you're only in one cloud, I think you can probably get away with just using the cost management tool in that cloud vendor. I don't think it's necessary for everyone and I think you have to have enough optimizations to have your return on investment, but it's certainly suited if you plan to grow and you're still small, get it now and don't wait.
Read full review
NetApp
CloudCheckr is fantastic for those that are purely in the Cloud as it provides everything you need under one roof for a comprehensive configuration and usage monitoring tool. It has SysLog capabilities though so you can farm out the alerts into a SIEM or other log management system, so hybrid environments could also benefit from its use.
Read full review
Pros
Apptio, an IBM Company
  • In Analyzing the detailed analysis of the cloud costs usage specifically in terms of analyzing AWS CUR reports which consists of very huge files.
  • In terms of offering the rich set of dimensions related to the resources across the clouds and sharing it to levels of personas
  • It's good that APIs that allow integrations with other systems for data sharing and automation based on the organizational needs.
  • Automation and policy enforcement especially in terms of activities like shutting down of the resources in the Non Business hours.
Read full review
NetApp
  • Detailed Best Practices. It's important to align your cloud to industry best practices for security and cost—it just performs better if it's used the way it's meant to be used. AWS is very flexible, and that's great when you have special requirements, but you've got to at least know when you're using something in a non-standard way so you can think through the implications.
  • Cost Reduction. Some recommendations are almost impossible to make at least for our setup, but many, many others are easy. We only have to log into CloudCheckr every few months and make a few changes for it to more than pay for itself.
  • Right-Sizing. This is related to the other points, but for some reason is separate from their cost module. The metrics it's able to pull only tell half the story, so it's good to verify it's sizing recommendations before making changes. But it does show you what instances to focus on first, and even if you choose a slightly different size to move it to, it does clearly indicate it's current size isn't appropriate. And this works both ways, if the size is too big, you can save some cash by making it smaller, but if it's too small, you want to be sure to scale up before you run into performance problems.
Read full review
Cons
Apptio, an IBM Company
  • There is currently no ability to apply global filters over the data in cloudability. Rather users must go through a difficult process to create custom views which they are later able to apply over top of their datasets.
  • Drill functionality does not really exists but appears to be more of an after though add-on. Yes you are able to "drill" but the visuals disappear and even the ability to export the more detailed information.
Read full review
NetApp
  • CloudCheckr features have a tendency to break without warning. Functionality in place for months could suddenly stop working.
  • CloudCheckr support often delays work on support tickets for fixing broken application functionality.
  • The CloudCheckr platform and documentation website often crash or experience performance degradation.
  • CloudCheckr cost reporting is often impacted by faulty code or broken report functionality. This can contribute to a low level of confidence in CloudCheckr's ability to deliver accurate cost reporting.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apptio, an IBM Company
If it were up to me, I would renew and dedicate additional resources to the product
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Usability
Apptio, an IBM Company
Very strong tool, nearly as clunky as older tools like CloudCheckr and much more fully featured than newer tools like Pileus. It's easy to get started with drilling into data for experienced FinOps users; others end users have a learning curve, but I don't think that's specific to Apptio Cloudability. The biggest drawback I find is the tool is buggier than others (e.g. CloudHealth), and constantly having to refresh a browser makes for a poor user experience.
Read full review
NetApp
Overall, CloudCheckr covers all our AWS monitoring needs and great integration through SysLog into our SIEM to capture alerts for investigation. The reports are great and allow for an easy daily review. Small improvements could be made to the interface and better filtering in places would be good. Great product and the price is fair.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Apptio, an IBM Company
Only been 1 or 2 occaisions when not available, in 3 years
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Performance
Apptio, an IBM Company
Afternoons tend to be a little slower, due to US traffic I assume
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Apptio, an IBM Company
Very responsive, knowledgeable staff and quick resolutions to issues
Read full review
NetApp
Fantastic Support team who are responsive and address question and concerns promptly with a thorough explanation and fast resolution.
Read full review
Online Training
Apptio, an IBM Company
Training was adequate, but the real learning begins when you start using the product, like most things. All major functions were covered so as an entry point, was a good introduction to the product. The training pace was good as well, the areas were covered in decent depth, without being too much of an information overload.
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Apptio, an IBM Company
Cloudability has more calculated fields for the CUR information, simplifying the reporting process. The performance of the tool for dashboarding and reporting is much faster as well as far more flexible. Being able to easily create reports and surface them to users with a few clicks provides much greater benefits over the dashboarding and reporting within CloudCheckr. CloudCheckr does have a more robust resource inventory reporting system with lots of services and data fields. Cloudy surfaces a great deal more opportunities for rightsizing than CloudCheckr too
Read full review
NetApp
There are a few products out there that'll do an aspect or two of what CloudCheckr does, but I honestly couldn't find anything nearly as comprehensive as CloudCheckr.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Apptio, an IBM Company
I wasn't personally involved, but all dealings with Apptio have been easy
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Apptio, an IBM Company
Works as designed
Read full review
NetApp
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Apptio, an IBM Company
  • Positive - as our utilization of Cloud platforms has increased, getting better reporting has been a key objective and Cloudability has allowed us to achieve this.
  • Positive - has allowed us to find opportunities for Cloud savings and improve our utilization of Cloud resources.
Read full review
NetApp
  • CloudCheckr has allowed us to increase resell margins as an MSP.
  • CloudCheckr has made us aware of cost savings opportunities that exceed the price of the platform itself.
  • CloudCheckr has given us additional visibility that has allowed us to manage and understand cloud computing costs.
Read full review
ScreenShots