TrustRadius

Aruba EdgeConnect vs. Azure Virtual WAN

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aruba EdgeConnect
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Aruba EdgeConnect (formerly Silver Peak Unity EdgeConnect) SD-WAN edge platform is designed to enable enterprises to reduce the cost and complexity of building a WAN by leveraging broadband to connect users to applications. By enabling customers to use broadband connections to augment or replace their current MPLS networks, the solution aims to improve customer responsiveness, increases application performance, and significantly reduces capital and operational expenses by up to…N/A
Azure Virtual WAN
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's Azure Virtual WAN connects global branch offices, point-of-sale locations, and sites using Azure and the Microsoft global network. With it the user can plan, configure, and seamlessly deploy new connections.N/A
Pricing
Aruba EdgeConnectAzure Virtual WAN
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aruba EdgeConnectAzure Virtual WAN
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aruba EdgeConnectAzure Virtual WAN
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Aruba EdgeConnectAzure Virtual WAN
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.4 out of 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.4 out of 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aruba EdgeConnectAzure Virtual WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aruba EdgeConnectAzure Virtual WAN
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Azure Virtual WAN provides single functional interphase for routing, monitoring, connectivity and security operations. The connection of hubs in Azure virtual WAN makes it simple for us to use Microsoft as the pillar of our spoke connectivity. The platform provides us with robust connectivity features that allow for transitive connectivity across different spokes. However, you should always ensure you have understood your total cost of ownership to avoid potential price bombshells.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • It offers a seamless experience while connecting Virtual networks and Workloads via Azure Hub.
  • Lot of connectivity options present - site to site VPN/Express route etc.
  • Very easy connectivity and migration with on-premise sites and Azure Hub.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • Integrations are limited within Azure. It is difficult to carry out multi-cloud integrations.
  • If you haven't understood your monthly cost you can receive price shocks.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
As we were already using Azure as a cloud platform, it was easy setting up a Virtual WAN inside Azure as users/developers and DevOps engineers were familiar with the user interface and functioning as compared to going to some other portal for just the VWAN solution. The umbrella of features provided by Azure Virtual WAN made it the right choice for our infrastructure.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
  • Automatic troubleshooting solves incidents without costing our operational time.
  • We are able unify all our operational activities.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots