Avast Secure Internet Gateway (SIG) vs. Check Point 2200 Appliances- Discontinued

The scenario that Avast is great would be for large companies, where it works through homeoffice. Avast would be a bad idea for the educational institution, that is, a place where it will be directed to an underage audience, but I believe that Avast is on its way to becoming a global use system, so in the future it can be used in scenarios.

Incentivized

These are great appliances for small/medium size offices. They do have limited port availability but are normally adequate for our needs.

Incentivized

• ‘Designer’ of the site is great
• Access places
• The easiness to follow each demand

Incentivized

• Performance
• Ease of management
• Functionality

Incentivized

• Should be able to leave in only 1 language
• Make Avast more communicative
• It has the possibility of leaving it our way

Incentivized

• Cost
• Tier 1 support is challenging at times

Incentivized

In my institution we didn't choose Avast, as they see the best for the team, that is, in this case I didn't have access to the other Avast. But in this case, I can pass on my experience with the Avast that I use. It is great, but it is necessary to improve in several aspects, such as the structure.

Incentivized

Both were great products but Check Points seemed to be easier to manage and more stable. While cost was also comparable we chose Check Point because of our enterprise investment with them

Incentivized

• Great for team communication
• Great for improving our understanding of the product.
• Terrible in language setting

Incentivized

• Stability
• Consistent Rule application
• Easy to Manage and maintain

Incentivized