Balto vs. CallMiner Eureka

New agents are given Balto and are able to take calls successfully from day one. They take incoming calls and Balto listens to both sides of the conversation and when things are said it will prompt the agent to move forward in different ways. It also will prompt if agents are speaking too much or if the agent isn't listening and asking the same question it will prompt them.

Incentivized

Call history tracking functionalities and the ability to manage different contacts are effective through CallMiner Eureka's capabilities. Setting the interface is an easy task and the quality of the tool services is an incredible and easy communication platform for the members of the different projects. The tool has effective scheduling functions and easy project management tools which allows effective data import through the integration tools.

Incentivized

• Lights up to let us know we are following the script.
• Makes sure we are asking and gathering all the correct questions.
• I like that we get confetti at the end to tell us we have done a good job.

Incentivized

• Intent scoring
• Custom User Dashboards
• Drill down to each touchpoint experience

Incentivized

• Just making sure it is hearing what is said correctly.

Incentivized

• Admin tools such as integration/ingestion tracking.

Incentivized

We have not yet had to contact support for our Eureka service.

Incentivized

CallMiner Eureka was stronger in reporting but weaker inaccuracy. It provided good reports to focus our QA program and individuals but sometimes the interpretation of the statements was wrong.

Incentivized

• This question is above my pay scale.

Incentivized

• Easy to engage with customers.
• Effective project communication platform.
• Easy to provide reports and also manage contacts list.

Incentivized