Blue Yonder Luminate Planning vs. IBM Cognos Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
Score 1.1 out of 10
N/A
Luminate Planning from Blue Yonder headquartered in Scottsdale (formerly JDA Software Group) leverages a digital twin foundation to intelligently predict potential problems and opportunities, offer machine learning-based recommendations for action, and pivot production, inventory, and labor plans to minimize risk. It is an SCM platform that supports demand planning and inventory optimization, as well as production planning and supply network design, and replenishment.N/A
IBM Cognos Analytics
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cognos is a full-featured business intelligence suite by IBM, designed for larger deployments. It comprises Query Studio, Reporting Studio, Analysis Studio and Event Studio, and Cognos Administration along with tools for Microsoft Office integration, full-text search, and dashboards.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Blue Yonder Luminate PlanningIBM Cognos Analytics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
On Demand - Standard
USD 10.00
per month per user
On Demand - Premium
USD 42.40
per month per user
On Demand - Standard
USD 10.60
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Blue Yonder Luminate PlanningIBM Cognos Analytics
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Blue Yonder Luminate PlanningIBM Cognos Analytics
Features
Blue Yonder Luminate PlanningIBM Cognos Analytics
Supply Chain Planning
Comparison of Supply Chain Planning features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.0
3 Ratings
5% below category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Custom alerts7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario-based planning6.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource optimization6.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply forecasting8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Capacity estimation7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Employee allocation6.72 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply network coordination6.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Procurement Management
Comparison of Procurement Management features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
6.4
3 Ratings
14% below category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Raw material sourcing6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply market analysis7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost analysis6.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense Logging6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Fulfillment Management
Comparison of Order Fulfillment Management features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.7
2 Ratings
2% below category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Order fulfillment optimization7.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Return services5.92 Ratings00 Ratings
Purchase order generation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Purchase order tracking8.22 Ratings00 Ratings
Supplier delivery scheduling8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Pricing and product configurations generation8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Logistics and Transportation Management
Comparison of Logistics and Transportation Management features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
6.9
3 Ratings
6% below category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Packaging6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Delivery planning7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Route optimization7.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Shipping performance7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Fleet management7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse & Inventory Management
Comparison of Warehouse & Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.2
2 Ratings
9% below category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Automation of warehouse operations7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory storage8.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Stock monitoring7.42 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory tracking7.42 Ratings00 Ratings
Warehouse asset management6.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory and price forecasting7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Demand Management
Comparison of Demand Management features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
7.1
2 Ratings
3% below category average
IBM Cognos Analytics
-
Ratings
Demand signal sensing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Demand forecasting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer analytics7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory stock optimization5.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales and operations planning8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Pricing and promotion tracking6.92 Ratings00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
-
Ratings
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.5
113 Ratings
9% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings7.5103 Ratings
Customizable dashboards00 Ratings7.8111 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings7.2107 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
-
Ratings
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.6
115 Ratings
5% below category average
Drill-down analysis00 Ratings7.4112 Ratings
Formatting capabilities00 Ratings7.5114 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings7.680 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings7.9110 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
-
Ratings
IBM Cognos Analytics
8.0
114 Ratings
3% below category average
Publish to Web00 Ratings8.327 Ratings
Publish to PDF00 Ratings7.6108 Ratings
Report Versioning00 Ratings8.626 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings7.6111 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers00 Ratings8.112 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
-
Ratings
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.4
105 Ratings
7% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings7.7100 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings7.996 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings7.092 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining00 Ratings7.130 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
-
Ratings
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.9
110 Ratings
8% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.0107 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.1106 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings7.1105 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control00 Ratings8.135 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.089 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
-
Ratings
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.1
91 Ratings
10% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access00 Ratings7.585 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings7.275 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile00 Ratings8.181 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Blue Yonder Luminate Planning
-
Ratings
IBM Cognos Analytics
7.6
72 Ratings
2% below category average
REST API00 Ratings7.569 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings8.066 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings8.39 Ratings
Java API00 Ratings6.911 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings7.110 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings7.87 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Blue Yonder Luminate PlanningIBM Cognos Analytics
Small Businesses
Acumatica
Acumatica
Score 8.8 out of 10
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Precoro
Precoro
Score 8.9 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
SAP S/4HANA Cloud
Score 8.5 out of 10
Kyvos Insights
Kyvos Insights
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Blue Yonder Luminate PlanningIBM Cognos Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
7.3
(4 ratings)
7.5
(136 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(29 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(9 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
6.1
(3 ratings)
1.3
(9 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(4 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(7 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.8
(5 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
2.9
(4 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Blue Yonder Luminate PlanningIBM Cognos Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
JDA WMS is a tier 1 solution for warehousing environments. Due to its price, it may not be suitable for smaller operations. Since the system allows for multiple clients, and since my company is a 3PL, JDA WMS works well for 3PL providers.
Read full review
IBM
I use predictive analytics techniques, which can help me predict my future sales based on collected data, giving me insight into my market's trends.This market data can be analyzed, giving me the opportunity to gain in-depth insight into my market's competition and positioning it competitively, aided by developing strategies to improve my marketing approach.
Read full review
Pros
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
  • Great customer facing implementation team.
  • Predictable and communicated improvement processes.
  • Constant roll out of new features with a strong SIG committee.
Read full review
IBM
  • We can make dozens of dispatchers all focusing on different types of workloads.
  • Friendly user interface, without the need for coding or complicated editing.
  • Highly functionality reporting tools.
  • We can easily create trigger when a certain threshold are met sending reports or alerts to needed parties.
Read full review
Cons
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
  • Efficiency - At times the response time to retrieve the data from DB could be improved.
  • Cheaper pricing - can provide some concession with the pricing.
  • Training - JDA could offer more free training programs.
Read full review
IBM
  • API integration is not upto the mark with very limited options.
  • Laptops get overheated when the tool is used from moderate to heavy use. Also, there is a lag in the tool times.
  • Licensing & Maintenance can go from cheap to expensive depending on the scope.
  • Lot of scope to improve the customer support & its not upto the industry standards.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
No answers on this topic
IBM
For an existing solution, renewing licenses does provide a good return on investment. Additionally, while rolling out scorecards and dashboards with little adhoc capabilities, to end users, cognos is very easily scalable. It also allows to create a solution that has a mix of OLAP and relational data-sources, which is a limitation with other tools. Synchronizing with existing security setup is easy too.
Read full review
Usability
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
No answers on this topic
IBM
We have a strong user base (3500 users) that are highly utilizing this tool. Basic users are able to consume content within the applied security model. We have a set of advanced users that really push the limits of Cognos with Report and Query Studio. These users have created a lot of personal content and stored it in 'My Reports'. Users enjoy this flexibility.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
No answers on this topic
IBM
Reports can typically be viewed through any browser that can access the server, so the availability is ultimately up to what the company utilizing it is comfortable with allowing, though report development tends to be more picky about browsers and settings as mentioned above. It also has an optional iPad app and general mobile browsing support, but dashboards lack the mobile compatibility. What keeps it from getting a higher score is the desktop tools that are vital to the development process. The compatibility with only Windows when the server has a wide range of compatibility can be a real sore point for a company that outfits its employees exclusively with Mac or Linux machines. Of course, if they are planning on outsourcing the development anyways, it's a rather moot point
Read full review
Performance
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
No answers on this topic
IBM
Overall no major complaints but it doesn't handle DMR (Dimensionally Modeled for Relational) very well. DMR modelling is a capability that IBM Cognos Framework Manager provides allowing you to specify dimensional information for relational metadata and allows for OLAP-style queries. However, the capability is not very efficient and, for example, if I'm using only 2 columns on a 20-column model, the software is not smart enough to exclude 18 columns and the query side gets progressively larger and larger until it's effectively unusable.
Read full review
Support Rating
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
It's still an older system which could use some updating.
Read full review
IBM
Why is their web application not working as fast as you think it should? They never know, and it is always a a bunch of shots in the dark to find out. Trying to download software from them is like trying to find a book at the library before computers were invented.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
No answers on this topic
IBM
Onsite training provided by IBM Cognos was effective and as expected. They did not perform training with our data which was a bit difficult for our end-users.
Read full review
Online Training
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
No answers on this topic
IBM
The online courses they offer are thorough and presented in such a way that someone who isn't already familiar with the general design methodologies used in this field will be capable of making a good design. The training environments are provided as a fully self contained virtual machine with everything needed already to create the environments. We've had some persisting issues with the environments becoming unavailable, but support has been responsive when these issues arise and straightening them out for us
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
No answers on this topic
IBM
Make sure that any custom tables that you have, are built into your metadata packages. You can still access them via SQL queries in Cognos, but it is much easier to have them as a part of the available metadata packages.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
JDA WMS was a large step up from our legacy Infor solution. It filled many gaps that we couldn't fill with Infor's system. Rather than continuing to build solutions in-house to account for customer requirements, we decided to implement JDA WMS and use all of that system's capabilities to handled what we needed in our warehouses. Granted, Infor's solutions have probably improved since 2007 when we changed, but those were my experiences back when we changed WMS providers.
Read full review
IBM
My company selected IBM Congos Analytics because of its advanced features and data representation for data analysis. Its row and column features are very effective for creating dashboards and reports to visualize data. It's chart representation and view format are very attractive and useful for representation.
Read full review
Scalability
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
No answers on this topic
IBM
The Cognos architecture is well suited for scalability. However, the architecture must be designed with scalability in mind from day one of the implementation. We recently upgraded from 10.1 to 10.2.1 and took the opportunity to revamp our architecture. It is now poised for future growth and scalability.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Blue Yonder (formerly JDA Software Group)
  • Alignment with customer service programs.
  • Visibility for optimization and transportation cost savings.
  • Vendor performance overviews.
Read full review
IBM
  • Positive: It provides collaboration and sharing of knowledge with other users which provides centralized access to data and reports.
  • Positive: It helps organization to save time and be efficient as it provides self service analytics and automated workflows.
  • Positive: With its powerful analytics and reporting capabilities it enables user to explore and analyze their data, identify the trends and make decisions based on those insights.
  • Negative: Implementing Cognos Analytics will take investments on licensing cost, training and infrastructure.
  • Negative: As it provides many features and capabilities, it is an issue with organization having limited IT support configure and maintain the platform.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Cognos Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of a natural language query, used in IBM Cognos Analytics to get AI-powered insights from data.Screenshot of AI-generated insights and forecasts that can be added with just a click of a button.Screenshot of a dashboard that can be generated automatically using IBM Cognos Analytics by uploading or selecting data.Screenshot of an AI-generated dashboard from a spreadsheet that was just uploaded. This offers a great starting point for the creative process.Screenshot of where to import data to IBM Cognos Analytics from CSV files and spreadsheets. Users can connect to cloud or on-premises data sources, including SQL databases, Google BigQuery, Amazon, and Redshift.Screenshot of a sample operational dashboard of a coffee shop created using IBM Cognos Analytics.