Built for Teams vs. LinkedIn Talent Hub

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Built for Teams
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Built for Teams is an HRIS solution that is designed for small and mid-sized businesses. The vendor’s value proposition is that their employee self-service capabilities help to offload work from valuable HR managers while giving employees direct access to important information. Additionally, the vendor says customers select their solution due to the intuitive user interface and their excellent customer service.N/A
LinkedIn Talent Hub
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
LinkedIn Talent is a recruiting solution. It offers core ATS capabilities, as well as proactive recruitment outreach tailored to LinkedIn’s site. LinkedIn Talent also enables competitive insights and recruitment marketing.N/A
Pricing
Built for TeamsLinkedIn Talent Hub
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Built for TeamsLinkedIn Talent Hub
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Built for TeamsLinkedIn Talent Hub
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.4
6 Ratings
18% above category average
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data7.15 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting9.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
8.0
1 Ratings
0% below category average
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
8.7
5 Ratings
8% above category average
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
Approval workflow8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Balance details9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.5
3 Ratings
16% above category average
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Update personal information10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.9
4 Ratings
26% above category average
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
Report builder9.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-built reports10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
10.0
2 Ratings
22% above category average
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
New hire portal10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
-
Ratings
LinkedIn Talent Hub
7.1
77 Ratings
12% below category average
Job Requisition Management00 Ratings4.263 Ratings
Company Website Posting00 Ratings7.167 Ratings
Publish to Social Media00 Ratings8.067 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings7.169 Ratings
Customized Application Form00 Ratings7.159 Ratings
Resume Management00 Ratings7.165 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention00 Ratings7.953 Ratings
Candidate Search00 Ratings8.076 Ratings
Applicant Tracking00 Ratings8.058 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings8.064 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation00 Ratings7.256 Ratings
Email Templates00 Ratings6.165 Ratings
User Permissions00 Ratings6.160 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts00 Ratings6.170 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings7.761 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Built for TeamsLinkedIn Talent Hub
Small Businesses
Patriot Software
Patriot Software
Score 9.0 out of 10
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.5 out of 10
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Infor Human Resources
Infor Human Resources
Score 7.3 out of 10
Vibe HCM
Vibe HCM
Score 4.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Built for TeamsLinkedIn Talent Hub
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(7 ratings)
7.1
(79 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(22 ratings)
User Testimonials
Built for TeamsLinkedIn Talent Hub
Likelihood to Recommend
Objective Inc.
Perfect for allowing employees to track their paid time off and sick days. Useful for providing job summaries, explanation of benefits. We don't use it for tracking compensation, but it could be used for that purpose. We also post job announcements on the platform which is useful for me to see what kinds of jobs we are hiring for.
Read full review
LinkedIn
I really feel like [LinkedIn Talent Hub] has great potential to be used by many many companies. I think if it is made a little more user friendly with a little more development on the back end to remove some bugs, this could be a potential game changer. I have enjoyed working and getting to know this.
Read full review
Pros
Objective Inc.
  • Managing PTO (sick and vacation)
  • Tracking firm demographic information
  • Ensuring that we have plenty of staff in the office each day
  • Employees get easy to use access to all of their time off data
Read full review
LinkedIn
  • Source of talent - LinkedIn has become the #1 place to engage talent.
  • Targeting / advertising / sponsoring employment ads are very effective. They are costly, but effective.
  • Connecting with talent via InMails and ability to send InMails to a pretty targeted audience with ease is great. This allows you to reach out/connect fast with people that "fit" what you are looking for. Other sites for recruiting, etc. are hit and miss. The quality of results is the strongest on LinkedIn and has been for many, many years.
Read full review
Cons
Objective Inc.
  • Reporting can be more robust.
  • More user control and real-time communication via the app would be helpful.
  • A better online calendar layout could be more efficient, but the current one is sufficient as well.
Read full review
LinkedIn
  • Reporting. Major lacking here. If a job is closed then reopened (which that feature was recently removed), all reporting is wiped clean and picked back up with the "reopen" date. So it doesn't give a full history of the job activity.
  • Lacks adequate approvals in the system.
  • If you're a company with a risk of audits, I would not recommend Talent Hub. They lack compliance: the system allows us to "hire" someone who never applied to the job. Req history could be incomplete with the way reporting functions are set up. The system puts passive "sourced" candidates and applicants in the same bucket for pipeline workflows. Disposition status is inadequate and greatly lacking, etc.
  • Dashboard is not customizable.
  • We do not have our own unique req IDs. The system generates project IDs but these numbers are shared with all their clients, they're not unique to Ora so they are somewhat random and not in order.
  • They do not differentiate between a networking project and an approved requisition.
  • There's more, too many to list.
Read full review
Support Rating
Objective Inc.
No answers on this topic
LinkedIn
Although we never experienced any issues with the LinkedIn Talent platform or required any support, we always knew in the event that we did need assistance, it was readily available. LinkedIn as a whole is always very supportive and responsive whenever I've had any issues or even a simple question in the past. I'm sure anyone experiencing difficulties with the platform would have a resolution from the support team just about instantly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Objective Inc.
Slightly different focuses and I still use both. Microsoft Visio is great for creating all kinds of diagrams. Whereas Built for Tens is more about people management, so you can set up who is where and track their relationships through the other individuals in the organization. it’s all about using the right tool for the job at hand.
Read full review
LinkedIn
It's definitely better than other competitors because of one a better pool of candidates, who are well categorised and filtered, and the database is well updated. Also, it has a better UI with end to end hiring requirement management, that helps to make hiring faster and smarter. The UX though is a bit laggy, which can be improved
Read full review
Return on Investment
Objective Inc.
  • It makes tracking PTO super easy
  • We replaced a very expensive and clunky custom SharePoint intranet with an extremely cost-effect Built For Teams service.
  • It is super easy to maintain, leaving me free to tackle bigger issues in the organization
Read full review
LinkedIn
  • Positive impact. The tool has helped us in finding quality candidates for our hard to fill positions!
  • Helps in “pipelining” even after we fill a position, we make a folder of prospective candidates that we find through the platform. This list is then revisited once we have additional positions!
  • Outreach to global candidates. We have an office in Spain and we have found so many qualified candidates on the platform to fill those positions!
Read full review
ScreenShots

Built for Teams Screenshots

Screenshot of Interactive org chart allows you to add and reposition people and entire teams.Screenshot of Recruiting and applicant tracking features make hiring a smooth and painless process.Screenshot of Employees have easy access to their PTO balances and history.Screenshot of Onboarding process helps new employees get up to speed quickly while ensuring compliance.Screenshot of Dashboards and reports keep executives and managers in-the-know.