CB Permissions Replicator vs. Epicor ECM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CB Replicator
Score 2.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
A major problem of storing Dynamics 365 documents in SharePoint is the missing synchronization of privileges and permissions. This allows unauthorized SharePoint users to access private documents and sensitive data even if they don’t have CRM privileges to do so. CB Replicator, is an out-of-the-box solution that is designed to remedy this issue by automatically synchronizing Dynamics CRM privileges with SharePoint permissions.
$3,600
per 100 users
Epicor ECM
Score 4.6 out of 10
N/A
Epicor ECM is based on docStar, a document management software offering that was acquired by Epicor in 2017.N/A
Pricing
CB Permissions ReplicatorEpicor ECM
Editions & Modules
CB Dynamics CRM to SharePoint Permission Replicator for 100 User
$3,600
per 100 users
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CB ReplicatorEpicor ECM
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$80 per userNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CB Permissions ReplicatorEpicor ECM
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
CB Permissions ReplicatorEpicor ECM
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
CB Permissions Replicator
-
Ratings
Epicor ECM
9.4
4 Ratings
13% above category average
Content capture & imaging00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Document management00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Records management00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Content search & retrieval00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings9.94 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Automated workflows00 Ratings9.94 Ratings
Artificial intelligence00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Mobile support00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Integration00 Ratings9.93 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CB Permissions ReplicatorEpicor ECM
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.7 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 9.2 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CB Permissions ReplicatorEpicor ECM
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.9
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CB Permissions ReplicatorEpicor ECM
Likelihood to Recommend
Connecting Software
It is an ideal program for the portfolio of already consolidated clients, for large financial companies with a high professional profile. In the cases that I do not recommend it, it is for small and medium-sized financial companies, with a portfolio of clients in training, since the cost-benefit ratio is not attractive.
Read full review
Epicor Software
It is well suited for billing service storage and retrieval. It ends the need to pay extra for a storage space. It also makes for easy cleanup of files on a yearly basis.
Read full review
Pros
Connecting Software
  • Visually friendly for the end user, maintaining the most common design style for workers
  • The adaptation time and the learning curve is relatively shorter than other similar applications
Read full review
Epicor Software
  • Templates - By being able to create templates for each document type, it made organizing files much easier. It also made the titles similar in format, which also allows for better organization.
  • We were able to scan documents directly into docStar, which helped us eliminate extra steps. For example, if we were missing a page from a document, and we received it at a later time, we could scan just that page into docStar as opposed to scanning the entire document again.
  • The functionalities are straight forward, so it is not hard to use the docStar system.
Read full review
Cons
Connecting Software
  • The graphics could be developed in a better way, they should be more modern, friendly and show the information in more detail.
  • Develop a module in the application that allows personalization by the user, giving him the possibility to manage a tool made by him to suit him. Moves the APPS Mobile concept to the design of the program.
  • Although the tool is well integrated with Microsoft, you can think of a development of integration with social networks or mobile developments, both users, and customers.
  • Develop a more economical and simple version, aimed at small and medium enterprises, with small client portfolios
Read full review
Epicor Software
  • Cost is an issue, pricey for what it's essentially glorified cloud storage.
  • No ability to lookup vehicles by stock number or phone number.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Connecting Software
It is a complementary tool of the main CRM, which provides an adequate management of the documentation, reports, files that are derived from the business activity. It offers adequate levels of security for small businesses, the implementation is easy compared to other tools, it is easy to use, it offers adequate file capacity. In the future it can be strengthened with access to the cloud, development of apps and integration with other platforms.
Read full review
Epicor Software
No answers on this topic
Usability
Connecting Software
As it has already been said before, it is a simple implementation program, easy to use, with a short learning curve, with a friendly interface, a good design, a security according to the type of company and with the possibility of personalization. It provides an accessible cost tool to improve business management and document management.
Read full review
Epicor Software
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Connecting Software
Until now, technical support has not been required to a large extent, but for this question three variables must be taken into account; The level of complexity of the implementation of the tool, the courses, tutorials, training and learning curve of the users, and finally the technical support as such. This tool has implementation attributes and ease of use, reducing the incidence of technical support.
Read full review
Epicor Software
Our support for DocStar has been phenomenal! They are always prompt, courteous, and effective. We have never had a bad experience with the support staff and they are always available when we need their help.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Connecting Software
Check the seller's website, read the technical specifications of the product, calculate the investment in personnel, software and hardware, validate that the management modules document is what they are looking for. Project the integration of the program with the systems that the company manages. Read many reviews and note the most important points of the user experiences.
Read full review
Epicor Software
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Connecting Software
Basically, my main experience is focused on Dynamics, I have worked with similar tools developed in a particular way by the firms for which I have worked. They are monitoring tools developed by the system and planning area. For the internal use of the company. Obviously, this is a leading international program.
Read full review
Epicor Software
A former employee of our company chose DocStar after much research and Q&A with the DocStar seller. I believe she truly put a lot of time/effort into choosing this system, but the end result is that it is not a good match for our company. After reviewing her notes, I believe she chose the system due to its ability to be customized through the template system
Read full review
Return on Investment
Connecting Software
  • Without speaking directly of figures, on the positive side of the implementation of the program is tied to the time of learning the tool. In practice, it is much easier to learn by professionals, making the implementation time short, as well as, minimizes the margin of error in the initial handling of the program.
  • As it is a tool for easy learning and with a reduction in the margin of error due to the learning curve, it allows working only with the technical support offered by the provider, without having the need to create an internal department of attention to the user, which lowers costs.
Read full review
Epicor Software
  • We have saved almost 10,000 dollars a year just in toner cost. We had to implement some up front cost for tablets and other computer aspects but the initial cost of this was about 3,000 to 4,000 dollars. docStar has saved us an instrumental amount of money and will so in the future as well.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CB Replicator Screenshots

Screenshot of User MappingScreenshot of Starting and Stopping the ServiceScreenshot of Edit Configuration