DISCO is a legal technology company that applies artificial intelligence and cloud computing to legal problems to help lawyers and legal teams improve outcomes for their clients. The vendor states corporate legal departments, law firms, and government agencies around the world use DISCO for ediscovery, case management, compliance, disputes, and investigations. In addition to its technology solutions, DISCO offers services to help legal teams manage ediscovery from anywhere at any…
N/A
Pricing
DISCO Ediscovery
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DISCO Ediscovery
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
DISCO’s all-inclusive flat-rate per-GB pricing is transparent and predictable, making it easy to accurately budget for any matter. Pricing automatically includes ingestion, processing, early case assessment, and production. In addition, DISCO does not charge for user licenses, meaning customers can add or remove user licenses based on the need of the case, not on the constraints of the budget. When it comes to managed review, DISCO guarantees every matter will come in on time and on budget.
I found DISCO to be easier to use than ViewPoint and Relativity. However, my use of this platform was strictly reviewing and coding. I didn't do any productions or upload documents, so I cannot attest to the functionality of DISCO as compared to the other two.
DISCO Ediscovery is easier to learn, more intuitive to use, and seems to give more consistent results. The interface is quite easy to use and gives a lot of information that aids in document review. The threading and family functions are extremely helpful
DISCO Ediscovery outperforms all the competitors we reviewed on ease of adoption, usability, UI design, support, functions, features, and feature updates. While the price was a bit higher, DISCO Ediscovery's value was far greater than that offered by the other products. DISCO …
Verified User
Professional
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
I believe Relativity had greater functionality for more advanced users, but it's more complicated nature caused more mistakes among users who lacked experience.
Relativity. I found the interface of Relativity more intuitive. However, it is easier to manipulate documents on DISCO. Both could be improved by allowing you to mass download documents more easily.
We've used Relativity, Xera, and a few others I'm forgetting. I strongly dislike Relativity when I have to use it now that I've been using DISCO Ediscovery.
This is what I told the sales rep for Relativity and Lumix: "DISCO Ediscovery is much more user-friendly, faster, accurate, and… well, just everything else pales in comparison, is STILL an understatement – it was a collective decision and unanimous. We will stay with DISCO …
Verified User
Partner
Chose DISCO Ediscovery
DISCO kills Relativity in my mind. the speed, ease of use, modern and user-friendly interface, etc., etc. hands down. do not use Relativity if you can use disco. i haven't used concordance in ages because it was terrible than so I can only assume it's still terrible.
I used Relativity a long time ago and wasn't a fan. It was at the time very similar to Disco but you didn't have as much control and the interface wasn't as user-friendly.
For the user, DISCO was more intuitive to use and navigate. It also seemed to load documents faster than some other platforms. However, it felt like the search and filtering capabilities were less advanced.
Compared to the other document archive platforms our department has used in the past, DISCO Ediscovery provides greater search accuracy and organizational capabilities. The subscription price is slightly higher than the other competitors but the value DISCO Ediscovery …
I have used proprietary in-house software at a litigation management firm. The in-house software allowed for documents to be processed and coded in order for the end-user to run a report that met the end-users parameters. DISCO allows for documents to be ingested, and for …