Enovia vs. Propel

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Enovia
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Dassault Systèmes S.A. is a French company and a world leader in the production of 3D design software, 3D digital mock-up and product lifecycle management (PLM) solutions.
$15
per month
Propel
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Propel (or PropelPLM) headquartered in Santa Clara offers their Product Lifecycle Management application. Built on Salesforce, Propel is available in varying editions supporting quality management, product information management (PIM), as well as project costing, custom objects & API, product specifications, and various collaboration tools.N/A
Pricing
EnoviaPropel
Editions & Modules
Enovia
$15.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EnoviaPropel
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
EnoviaPropel
Small Businesses
PTC Creo
PTC Creo
Score 8.0 out of 10
PTC Creo
PTC Creo
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PTC Creo
PTC Creo
Score 8.0 out of 10
PTC Creo
PTC Creo
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP PLM
SAP PLM
Score 9.4 out of 10
SAP PLM
SAP PLM
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EnoviaPropel
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.9
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
EnoviaPropel
Likelihood to Recommend
Dassault Systemes
Very well suited for direct integration with CAD packages (Solidworks/ Auto desk Inventor or AutoCAD) and version control of CAD Model/Assemblies and Drawing files) and creating parts and document objects directly into Enovia and controlling their lifecycle from CAD Interface. Similarly, Enovia's Engineering central is already equipped with Industry standard ECR/ECO process which needs little customization for implementing Engineering Change management process. The hardest part in Enovia is controlling the disposition of released material for the downstream process in other ERP systems. For example, if a released material has gone for production or purchasing in ERP system/MRP system then dispositioning that material with Major revision (which may need manufacturing to stop the production due to faulty design) have no direct control to stop the downstream activities. Most cases its manual process to communicate with ERP team to for taking action. Similarly, revision of Documents (material Spec for example) linked to thousands of parts required special process (some time needs to schedule in the weekend).
Read full review
Propel
Scenario in which Propel is best on the grounds are : 1. Customer support is very enriching and helpful. 2. OMS electronic system is best part of it. 3. Salesforce platform is very user friendly. Scenario in which it needs improvement: 1. Platform releases sometimes affect business operation. 2. Preview and collaboration should be made very user friendly. 3. Variant and sharing management could be improved.
Read full review
Pros
Dassault Systemes
  • Every revision of a part or document is a separate object, hence unlike SAP status control of an object is easy. The lifecycle of each object can be controlled by its own policy.
  • It is easy to create new types of objects rather than pre-defined object types and control them by their own customized policy.
  • Efficient Security and access control model for design and supporting documents file checkout and check-in and easy reporting mechanisms for tracking business activity, like how many parts being created/revised/obsoleted and who has checked out how many times etc.
  • Generation of custom reports
Read full review
Propel
  • Offers full PLM capabilities on my mobile phone.
  • Greater flexibility to manage other customer facing processes.
  • Customer service is very fast.
Read full review
Cons
Dassault Systemes
  • When a part/assembly has been released in Enovia and gone for production or downstream processing, Enovia doesn't have much control, hence, Enovia should come up with an easy controlling mechanism for various disposition of parts and seamless communication with an ERP or downstream process.
  • If a document is linked to thousands of materials then revising this document takes long time gets floated to the BOMs where the previous document versions are used. So, Enovia should have an efficient way to replace the floating process or another efficient mechanism for document revision processing.
Read full review
Propel
  • Some of the platform issues and releases are still there which affect business operations.
  • Reporting option could be made better with Excel or Word.
  • Preview functionality is discouraging and needs to be addressed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Dassault Systemes
When evaluating Enovia as a PLM product the following Enovia stacks came out as a positive feature compared to other PLMs available on the market. 1. User-friendly interface 2. Easy to Integrate with CAD systems for the manufacturing Industry 3. It is quite easy to implement the Interface with ERP/MRP system (like SAP, Oracle manufacturing) 4. Availability of 3rd party ENOVIA -SAP interface and easy to plug in between two systems
Read full review
Propel
A major requirement for us was the ability to have a traditional ECN workflow, with multiple documents changed on the same workflow; most eQMS solutions do not include this capability. That ruled out several solutions for us. We selected Propel primarily because the cost was in-line with expectations and the reporting capabilities were excellent.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Dassault Systemes
  • Easy learning curve for the users- Very user-friendly Interface for Engineering central make the users happy and easy to learn the BOM creation and Engineering change management process.
  • Time-saving - Seamless Creation and revision process of objects saves a huge amount of time compared to other systems.
  • Easy to copy existing business data and modify them as required.
Read full review
Propel
  • Has allowed us to improve revenue at least 5% per campaign since we started using it
  • Has allowed us to realistically model marketing costs that are within 10% of the projected values
  • All of our 4 teams can see all marketing data
Read full review
ScreenShots