ESO Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a web-based patient care documentation and reference system for emergency medical responders and firefighters. It's designed to provide easy access to information about patients' medications, allergies, history, etc. from a tablet while in the field, and allow healthcare providers to document patient encounters quickly.
N/A
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Score8.4 out of 10
N/A
PointClickCare provides their cloud-based technology for the senior care industry, the PointClickCare Core EHR Platform.
N/A
Pricing
ESO EHR
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ESO EHR
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
ESO EHR
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of ESO Electronic Health Record and PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Feature
ESO Electronic Health Record
6.3
1 Ratings
13% below category average
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
6.5
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Charting / document management
10.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Templates
10.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support
10.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Fax integration
5.01 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems
7.01 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Workflow automation
1.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Customization
1.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
E-prescribing
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of ESO Electronic Health Record and PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Feature
ESO Electronic Health Record
9.5
1 Ratings
13% above category average
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
9.5
3 Ratings
13% above category average
HIPAA compliance
10.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Role-based permission levels
8.01 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy
10.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe
10.01 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of ESO Electronic Health Record and PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Feature
ESO Electronic Health Record
6.0
1 Ratings
23% below category average
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
8.0
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task tracking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of ESO Electronic Health Record and PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
Feature
ESO Electronic Health Record
-
Ratings
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
9.0
3 Ratings
18% above category average
Real-time eligibility verification
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Claims management
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Coding
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Patient billing
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Financial Reporting
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of ESO Electronic Health Record and PointClickCare Core EHR Platform
For most EMS providers, ESO EHR is an ideal solution: It meets 95% of the needs for the typical EMS provider, provides an unparalleled ease of use for field personnel documenting patient care, and is easy to implement and administer. Large EMS systems should carefully consider the limitations of the underdeveloped quality management modules for QA/QI programs. Large or progressive EMS systems with an advanced data analytics/data science capability should be aware of the significant challenges and limitations ESO EHR poses for data use outside of the standard analytics reports.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform is an excellent platform for monitoring patient data. The ability to generate customizable reports is extremely helpful when it comes to analyzing various kinds of data (e.g administration record reports, action summary reports, detailed census reports). The platform really does a great job organizing patient data in a way that is intuitive and easy to interpret.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The biggest gap is that doing QA/QI is not scalable or streamlined for a large provider. Managing an effective QA/QI program takes an incredible amount of labor and extra work.
The lack of customization and custom fields heavily limits use of ESO EHR to capture new data points for internal quality improvement or research projects.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It would be interesting to allow for a "post cash" aging view, whereby those who post cash can see what the aging will look like once a cash batch is posted. Otherwise, I have no immediate items which could benefit from imporvements.
I have implemented PCC in over 100 buildings and have used it for almost 5 years. I can count maybe 2 times in 5 years when PCC downtime caused an issue for our facilities. I would say their availability rating exceeds a 10 compared to other software systems.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If by "overall support" you mean "customer service," only once were they unable to provide the assistance I needed--but it wasn't an important element of my job so no matter.
Have already stated. People learn differently and PCC needs to adapt to that model instead of all eLearning. Offer the client different learning packages.
ESO EHR won out due to ease of use for providers and for administration. Other vendors had greater ability to do data analysis, quality management, and customization but ultimately were significantly more difficult to learn, use, and administer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
PointClickCare Core EHR Platform was selected because it is organized much more cleanly than MatrixCare. In PointClickCare Core EHR Platform, patient EHRs are laid out in such a way that accessing different kinds of information is a lot quicker than it is in MatrixCare. In PointClickCare Core EHR Platform, all of the tabs (profile, census, DX list, progress notes, assessments, etc.) are easily accessible with just one click. In MatrixCare this is not the case, as you must first click into another menu before being able to access other tabs. Also the overall look of PointClickCare Core EHR Platform is more professional and streamlined.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The platform has helped to increase productivity within our organization.
Increased workflow efficiency leading to less hours spending time compiling data.
Allowed our organization to expand the number of business opportunities -- the increased workload is manageable due to PointClickCare Core EHR Platform's usability.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info