F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs. OpenVPN Access Server
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | F5 Networks provides BIG-IP Access Policy Manager as an identity and access solution which can be deployed as a standalone solution or as an add-on to F5 Networks' flagship BIG-IP TLM or F5 Advanced WAF applications. | N/A |
OpenVPN Access Server | Score8.6 out of 10 | N/A | OpenVPN headquartered in Pleasanton allows users to create secure access to a private network in the cloud or on-premise with Access Server. Access Server is available to deploy directly on various cloud platforms like Amazon AWS, Google GCP, Microsoft Azure, DigitalOcean, and also available as ready-to-deploy virtual appliances for Microsoft HyperV and VMWare ESXi. Alternately, OpenVPN Access Server Virtual Appliance is a full-featured secure network tunneling VPN virtual appliance solution… | $27 per month 3 connections (minimum) |
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | OpenVPN Access Server | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | More connections reduces cost per connection, as does going with an annual plan versus a monthly price. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | OpenVPN Access Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 24 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
96% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 25 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 18 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
91% Implementation went as expected 20 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | OpenVPN Access Server | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual Private Network |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | OpenVPN Access Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.4 | 9.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.3 | - |
| Usability | 8.2 | 10.0 |
| F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) | OpenVPN Access Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | OpenVPN Access Server Screenshots |





