Figma vs. Foleon

Figma has been beneficial for building auto layout screens when you need to switch out a component or move a page layout to reduce the design time and 'pixel perfection' you would typically see in other programs. Its prototyping tools are great for the basics to create high-fidelity screens for user research and stakeholder communications, but anything more complex is either buggy or incredibly development-oriented. Designers don't have the luxury of time to figure out how to code the 'if' and 'else' thinking, often having to opt for online demonstrations to hand off to developers. It's straightforward to grasp if you've used any other design software and is relatively lightweight in terms of the tools. A design system streamlines so much of the effort in our screens, even if you need to detach!

Incentivized

With templates, themes, and roles,
it facilitates cross-team collaboration and content production while ensuring
consistency in our branding and content management.

It is very useful to improve our
procedures, collect information and ensure that our martech works together.

Foleon allows us
to add background movies, parallax effects, and other animations to increase
customer engagement.

Incentivized

• Figma includes robust prototyping features, allowing designers to create interactive and animated prototypes
• Figma integrates well with various other tools and platforms, including Slack, Jira, and user testing tools
• Figma has a vibrant community and a wealth of resources, including templates, plugins, and tutorials.

Incentivized

• Foleon is a very easy to use tool to create different types of posts.
• The learning curve is relatively shallow and the user interface is very logical.

Incentivized

• Sometimes, I have to break components - if there was an easier way to customize on the spot without breaking them.
• If I change the naming convention in the library, it would be nice to replace the old version. Because it will just remove the style altogether, I have to go back and apply it again.

Incentivized

• The platform can be quite slow at times, especially during posting.
• I would also like to be able to limit access to media files and information.

Incentivized

Figma is a pretty cool tool in many areas. My team almost uses it on daily basis, such as, brainstorming on product/design topics, discussing prototypes created by designers. We even use it for retrospectives, which is super convenient and naturally keeps records of what the team discusses every month. Furthermore, I do see the potential of the product - currently we mainly use it for design topics, but it seems it is also a good fit for tech diagrams, which we probably will explore further in the future.

Incentivized

It's so simple to use! I have no background in UI design but basic designing and I was able to learn this software Figma within 3-5 days. There are tons of tutorials available on Youtube from so many popular YouTubers in the space, you can just go through them and start designing.

The only regret I have is, its not available when there is no internet

Incentivized

I think its great, As there are many other software or systems which can be integrated with it as plugins or API's

Incentivized

I haven't used their support lately but in the past, they had a chat that I used often. They often responded in a few hours and were able to give a satisfactory solution. I would imagine it's less personal now but the community has expanded drastically so there are more resources out there to self serve with a bit of Google magic.

Incentivized

In-person training has its own benefits - 1. It helps in resolving queries then and there during the training. 2. I find classroom or in-person training more interactive. 3. Classroom or in-person training could be more practical in nature where participants can have an hands on experience with tools and clarify their doubts with the trainer.

Incentivized

Online training has its own merits and demerits - 1. Sometimes we may face issues with connectivity or the training content 2. The way training is being delivered becomes very important because not everyone is comfortable taking online training and learning by themselves. 3. With the advancement of technology online training has become popular but there is a segment of people who still prefer class-room training over online one.

Incentivized

Figma blows these out the park. Adobe's system is very different, and I think this shows in their attempted acquisition of Figma. I've not used Sketch or Invision, but their lack of market presence says a lot—designers like using the best tools. Axure is definitely more comprehensive in prototype testing but very hard to adapt to use—the hotkeys aren't even the same!

Incentivized

Foleon
makes it easy to create interactive and absolute material relevant to our
organization's brand so that it is accessible to our readers while allowing us
to create personalized digital content experiences.

Incentivized

I think this is great and as I mentioned at ADP we use Figma extensively whether by designers, researchers or content writers

Incentivized

• Seamless integration of designs into Jira have helped double the level of accuracy during development. Interactive access to preview prototypes, flows and mockups has made a huge difference for us.
• When components are updated in ways that changes the copy or architecture, it breaks all of its instances creating a massive source of anxiety for everyone on the team. The fact that we are uncertain whether our updates will retain text overrides forces us to triple check each time, decreasing our operational efficiency.
• When high-fidelity prototypes are built to showcase new concepts, their ability to appear almost identical to our production site makes it much easier for stakeholders to get involved in decision making therefore allowing us to make more well rounded decisions.

Incentivized

• In my personal opinion, we can say that this tool has had great positive aspects in our organization.

Incentivized