FlexPod vs. HPE Synergy

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FlexPod
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
FlexPod is a converged infrastructure option developed by NetApp and Cisco. FlexPod is available in streamlined and simplified Express version, and the FlexPod Datacenter edition for enterprise private clouds, VDI, scale-out infrastructure, or software defined data centers.N/A
HPE Synergy
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
HPE Synergy is Hewlett Packard Enterprise's software designed to support a composable infrastructure, which treats IT resources as a service that can be "composed" and deployed out to applications in near real-time, eliminating the need to configure hardware.N/A
Pricing
FlexPodHPE Synergy
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FlexPodHPE Synergy
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FlexPodHPE Synergy
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
FlexPodHPE Synergy
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
FlexPodHPE Synergy
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco + NetApp
FlexPod is great for mid to large size companies, where the flexibility and depth of a traditional SAN and high performance servers is required. For smaller companies, it might make more sense to go with a hyper converged solution such as Hyperflex or Nutanix (both of which can still run on Cisco UCS servers, but would not be making use of Netapp storage), to meet the requirements in a smaller footprint.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Best suited for virtualization and multi-environment implementations. Bare metal deployments have a few more limitations.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco + NetApp
  • Single Pane of Glass Server Administration.
  • Ease of firmware upgrades.
  • Incredible support when you have an issue. The Cisco/NetApp/VMware FlexPod support teams work together and drive your issues down to the root cause.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Nearly instant configuration of applications according to specific requirements within a single pool
  • Deployment, updating and monitoring via a single interface
  • Updates and redeployment with minimal service interruption
  • Support for virtual, bare metal and containerized workloads
Read full review
Cons
Cisco + NetApp
  • KVM control of the blades still requires Java. Avocent is using HTML5 now, and it would be nice if the KVM console for these UCS blades could too.
  • Price - Like any Cisco product, there are cheaper options. They aren't nearly as fully featured, but at times, it would be nice if UCS could be a bit cheaper.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Firmware repository size limitations could be larger (was increased recently but still is only room for a few SPPs)
  • Profile template updates flag all machines that haven't had their profile updated from the template, causing the dashboard to go red with warnings and can cause unnecessary concern
  • OneView, while powerful isn't as user friendly as it could be
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco + NetApp
No answers on this topic
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
The hardware has fulfilled all of the promises that it made when we first acquired it. The only thing that would preclude this would be if the organization decided to holistically switch hardware vendors for reasons other than performance and feature sets.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco + NetApp
Being a Cisco shop already it was a natural fit to go with a solution based on their technology. Then add in VMware which we are were already using - that was two out of the three for the FlexPod. Then factor in NetApp's de-duplication technology and flexibility in configuration and options and it's a match made in heaven. Not to say we haven't had some stumbles and some issues but it works and it works well.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
While all similar offerings can achieve basically the same thing, HPE Synergy stands out against Cisco and Dell offerings with respect to manageability, ease of use and flexibility - HPE Synergy offers configurations groups of chassis to create logical enclosures that can be managed as a single entity and also blades in any slot can be plumbed and allocated as necessary to multiple uplinks. This is one level more flexible than the others which limits configurations of blades in a single chassis to similar uplink settings. Also, the HPE Synergy chassis itself supports 12 blades vs 10 in competitive offerings.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco + NetApp
  • FlexPod has allowed our team to be extremely quick to resopnd to new VM build requests. The amount of RAM, CPU and backplane offered by B series blades allows us to go with very high VM density. The quick deployment of service profile templates also means that when we have to add new hosts, it is done quicker.
  • FlexPod and the service profile portability (along with VMware) has allowed for full upgrades and migrations from M1/M2 series hardware to M4 hardware without any downtime or outages to the clients. Blades can be moved into new chassis, or service profiles moved to new generation blades, with no impact to the customers' ability to work.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Eased concerns for go-live of a huge new deployment as we knew we could respond to any scaling concern swiftly and thoroughly
  • Hardware has been rock solid since implementation
  • Limits to initially deployed logical enclosure configurations have been addressed rapidly by the introduction of new hardware with fast speeds/additional management ring connectivity options
Read full review
ScreenShots