Hashboard (formerly Glean.io) is lightweight, business intelligence tool for teams with a collaborative data culture. Hashboard unlocks insights for companies with exploration and flexible data discovery paths for users ranging from data folks, business ops to customer success.
$70
per month 2 seats, then $30 per user up to 10 users of any type
Sigma
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Sigma Computing headquartered in San Francisco provides a suite of data services such as code free data modeling, data search and explorating, and related BI and data visualization services.
N/A
Pricing
Hashboard
Sigma Computing
Editions & Modules
Starter
$70
per month 2 seats, then $30 per user up to 10 users of any type
Team
$410
per month 10 seats (incl. 2 editors), then $50 per editor, $20 per collaborator
Enterprise
Custom
per month Contact us for custom pricing for enterprises that need SSO, flexible seats, partner projects and more
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hashboard
Sigma
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
15% discount for yearly pricing.
Contact us for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hashboard
Sigma Computing
Features
Hashboard
Sigma Computing
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Hashboard
-
Ratings
Sigma Computing
7.9
163 Ratings
3% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
7.1104 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
8.9161 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
7.7133 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Hashboard
-
Ratings
Sigma Computing
7.9
166 Ratings
2% below category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
8.6155 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
7.3163 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
7.35 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.2162 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Hashboard
-
Ratings
Sigma Computing
8.3
156 Ratings
0% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
8.9103 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.0130 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
8.2120 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.7132 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers
00 Ratings
7.568 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Glean.io is exceptionally well for creating automation data visualisation dashboards. Exploring the data is again highly effective. Visualisations are easily customisable to best suit the requirements of the team. Collaborating and commenting around the dashboards is very smooth. If there are any changes in the system or any feature requests, the support team takes some time to respond
We were able to set up client-facing embedded reports with ease and security. The interface is not difficult to learn, although we may not be aware of or lack the necessary expertise to utilize more advanced features that would likely benefit us.
Sigma Computing does not allow custom ordering of pivot fields in pivot tables easily
Sigma Computing lacks functionality for creating tables or sections that dynamically adjust to the browser window's height while maintaining a fixed height textbox at the bottom
Sigma Computing does not provide straightforward options for formatting totals in tables, such as renaming 'Total' to 'Average', 'Team Total', etc
Sigma Computing does not support searching by individual tab names within a workbook
Sigma has helped us a lot and has become an integral part of our daily workflow. It would be difficult to switch to another platform and have to rebuild the numerous metrics and performance reports that we have already established
It has a clean and modern interface. However, it is not completely intuitive. I think it would be better and easier to navigate with more Windows style drop down menus and/or tabls. There is a significant learning curve, but that may be due in part to the technical nature of this type of software tool.
They are very friendly and informative. They are quick in resolving our queries and help us understand very minute things as well. They are quick in creating feature tickets based on our custom requirements, and they would also create a bug ticket if there is any discrepancy and get that checked on time.
For simple use cases, Glean.io is a lightweight alternative to SAP Analytics Cloud. Provisioning, testing, and documentation are easier and less intimidating in the Glean.io case. Thus, it is easy to explore without firing up the sales machinery of the big corporates. Thus, the process of looking into and testing it out was way more convenient. Further, the data ops features were new to use and seem to be unique with Glean.io.
With Looker, to be effective, a substantial amount of coding & modeling needs to happen in LookML. Being another language to learn, users have to context switch again from at a minimum either SQL or Python into LookML. The concept of being able to source control, code review, and deploy your models is a plus though.
Tableau is the gold standard for data visualization, no question. Power users will be able to create dazzling content that Sigma won't necessarily be able to easily match. However, since development usually happens via an extract, helping other users troubleshoot is an arduous process. Trying to re-do or un-do all the transformations and calculations that cause a certain number is very difficult.
With Sigma, all the queries happen directly against Snowflake and you can see the query logs. The data modeling happens right in a tabular, spreadsheet-like manner, so within only a few minutes, substantial transformations can happen, with visualizations just a few more clicks away.
Monitoring health of cloud platform has allowed the company to anticipate issues before they affect customers – Sigma prompted us building a canary monitoring process that provides customer container health.
Customer success has used an activity report to discover customers running runaway processes that they were unaware of, creating an alert to contact the customer and prevent an embarrassing situation.
Customer success uses the activity report to prompt conversations regarding increases or declines in behavior that led to increasing contract limits or addressing churn concerns.