What users are saying about
27 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.9 out of 100
2 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.5 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

IBM FileNet

I would highly recommend IBM FileNet Content Manager to anyone who has needs that align with the following constraints:
  1. A client who needs highly resilient storage for content such as documents, media files, etc.
  2. A client who has a skilled support team that can perform periodic maintenance tasks on FileNet servers, WebSphere, and database
Ahmed Anwar Nasr | TrustRadius Reviewer

Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

The tool is very powerful for obtaining and scheduling reports; however, I believe that if the cost were lower, more companies could obtain it
Moises Hamud | TrustRadius Reviewer

Feature Rating Comparison

Enterprise Content Management

IBM FileNet
8.5
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Content capture & imaging
IBM FileNet
7.6
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
File sync, storage & archiving
IBM FileNet
9.8
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Document management
IBM FileNet
9.6
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Records management
IBM FileNet
9.8
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Content search & retrieval
IBM FileNet
9.8
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Enterprise content collaboration
IBM FileNet
7.3
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Content publishing & creation
IBM FileNet
7.6
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Security, risk management & information governance
IBM FileNet
9.0
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Contract lifecycle management
IBM FileNet
8.8
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Automated workflows
IBM FileNet
9.4
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Artificial intelligence
IBM FileNet
6.0
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
Mobile support
IBM FileNet
8.0
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1
Integration
IBM FileNet
7.6
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
9.1

Pros

IBM FileNet

  • Security.
  • Classification.
  • Organization.
  • Good encryption.
Ben Williams | TrustRadius Reviewer

Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

  • [It] has [a] default report.
  • [It] has a section where you can create reports by making queries in SQL.
  • It has a Dashboard window where you can schedule reports in real time of the executions of the jobs or chains.
Moises Hamud | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

IBM FileNet

  • User Interface could be better
  • Pricing could be better
  • Product training and documentation
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

  • It has a positive impact for the different managements since they can obtain their reports on a daily basis and in case any job fails on a recurring basis they can make decisions.
Moises Hamud | TrustRadius Reviewer

Usability

IBM FileNet

IBM FileNet 9.0
Based on 1 answer
From a developer's perspective, IBM FileNet Content Manager is definitely usable but the user experience and user interface for some of the development tools used in IBM FileNet Content Manager need a big improvement.From an end user's perspective; however, the usability is excellent. IBM Content Navigator, which is the default UI shipped with FileNet, is very good in terms of UI/UX, extendibility, customization options, and feature set.
Ahmed Anwar Nasr | TrustRadius Reviewer

Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Support Rating

IBM FileNet

IBM FileNet 9.3
Based on 2 answers
It's a great tool for our legacy system however the implementation, management time and lack of a niche provided by IBM makes it a difficult tool to recommend in a fast-paced market.
Ben Williams | TrustRadius Reviewer

Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

IBM FileNet

FileNet v ApplicationXtender
FileNet - much more robust.
ApplicationXtender - far more lightweight, easier to deploy and configure. Much more limited in scope.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

No answers on this topic

Return on Investment

IBM FileNet

  • A lot of improvement is required to FileNet error descriptions when we encounter with any FileNet errors.
  • For document management, workflow management and content repository. FileNet's capability to manage large number of files is awesome and robust.
  • Automation of business process which we developed for our last client has significantly improved their day to day process.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

  • The Redwood system by itself is a very good tool that can pay off the investment in a very short time.
  • It has a positive impact for the different managements since they can obtain their reports on a daily basis and in case any job fails on a recurring basis they can make decisions.
Moises Hamud | TrustRadius Reviewer

Screenshots

Pricing Details

IBM FileNet

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Rating Summary

Likelihood to Recommend

IBM FileNet
9.4
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web
8.2

Usability

IBM FileNet
9.0
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

Support Rating

IBM FileNet
9.3
Redwood Reporting : Report2Web

Add comparison