IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Manta

It's super terrific with workflow automation. Terrific with data backup and convenient with encryption of data. Reliable with asset management Great to discover virtual servers

Incentivized

If you need to know where a company is based and how many employees they have this is a great resource

Incentivized

• Any source to any target support.
• ETL flexibility without coding.
• Extreme data volume processing.
• Native integration with other Data integration functionalities such as data profiling, data cleansing, metadata management.

• Headquarters location
• Employee head count
• Similar businesses

Incentivized

• I would be nice to have a new web development environment for DataStage.
• Connectivity Packs such as Pack for SAP Application are a little pricey.
• It is confusing for new developers the possibility of developing jobs using different execution engines such as Parallel or Server.

Incentivized

• Updates don't seem to filter down as quickly as other sites if a company moves or closes

Incentivized

• Scale of implementation
• IBM techsupport

Incentivized

DataStage is more robust and stable than ODI The ability to perform complex transformations or implement business rules is much more developed in DS

They have a lot more detail and have more up to date information in my opinion

Incentivized

• If you don't use all of the product family, it will be expensive. But if you want to plan use all the products and you will position it in the center of your infrastructure ROI will be effective.

Incentivized

• Help me eliminate time on low headcount accounts
• Find out they were not in my territory

Incentivized