IBM Security QRadar EDR vs. Jamf Protect
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBM Security QRadar EDR | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users… | N/A |
Jamf Protect | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Developed exclusively for macOS, Jamf Protect provides a solution to maintain endpoint compliance, monitor for, respond to, and remediate security incidents on macOS with minimal impact to the device and end-user experience. Jamf Protect detects Mac-specific threats, and prevents known malware from running on devices and quarantines them for later analysis. Jamf Protect forwards data to a system of record to ensure a security posture, fleetwide, stays compliant by monitoring security settings on… | N/A |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Jamf Protect | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Jamf Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 11 Answers | 100% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
88% Delivers good value for the price 7 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 11 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
88% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 9 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Jamf Protect | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Endpoint Security |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Jamf Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 | SentinelOne Singularity Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 | ![]() BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score9.1 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 | ESET PROTECT Score8.8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Jamf Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| IBM Security QRadar EDR | Jamf Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | IBM Security QRadar EDR Screenshots |








