IBM Storage Fusion vs. StarWind SAN & NAS

I think its well suited for all modern programming. simple and ease of use are a plus.

Incentivized

StarWind is best suited for the integration and deployment part and for the storage part as well. The product is budget-friendly and helps us to improve business agility. Can't think of negative scenarios as of now.

Incentivized

• Connecting with multiple application DB of different data types and bringing the normalized data to on a roof/data lake
• Easy to build the models and analytics that's help better understanding of business operation
• AI models such as predictions, forecasts, and suggestions based on individual customer patterns or geo-clusters can build easily

Incentivized

• Ease of Deployment
• Management interface
• Documentation and support
• performance

• Improvement in areas where Software Defined Storage (SDS) can be better utilized with the broad capabilities of IBM storage features.
• Focus should be shifted towards enabling capabilities of cyber resiliency as the other offerings in the market are already equipped with the same.
• Broader non-IBM/Lenovo hardware support can be considered, specifically for IBM Storage fusion software offerings

Incentivized

• Can improve documentation.
• Can more focus on user training.

Incentivized

Incentivized

We chose StarWind SAN & NAS over Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct because it was more flexible to configure.

Incentivized

• IBM Fusion is ideal for Enterprise businesses or Ecosystems where large data types are in play. And added benefit to bringing them under a platform to add visualization and understanding.
• Managing and monitoring is easy when compare to other industry tool

Incentivized

• Allowed us to go all flash for 1/5 the cost
• Boosted end user experience due to high iops on flash
• lowered expenses on arrays and licensees