9 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9 out of 100
Top Rated
72 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.2 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is rated higher in 1 area: Usability
  • Instana and Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring are tied in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

8.0

Instana

80%
1 Rating
8.0

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

80%
22 Ratings

Usability

7.0

Instana

70%
1 Rating
7.3

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

73%
1 Rating

Support Rating

8.0

Instana

80%
1 Rating

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

N/A
0 Ratings

Contract Terms and Pricing Model

8.0

Instana

80%
1 Rating

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

N/A
0 Ratings

Professional Services

9.0

Instana

90%
1 Rating

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

N/A
0 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

IBM

We can able to find the exact root cause of the issues and GC and memory and ability to monitor overall services like solr etc
Read full review

Splunk

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is well suited for any complicated environment where you have apps and servers across multiple clouds and platforms and products. If you have a data centre where all your apps and servers are in one single network, you could probably get away with older solutions. But for any modern, complex, hybrid-cloud microservices environment, Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is a must-have.
Read full review

Pros

IBM

  • tracking error rate
  • page view dash board
  • http error like 4xx and 5xx
Read full review

Splunk

  • SignalFX handles historical metric aggregation exceptionally well, providing a multifaceted approach to event detection based on anomalies.
  • SignalFX's cost is incredibly flexible with their pricing model of DPM (data-point per minute) vs the traditional "per host" model that most monitoring SaaS use.
  • SignalFX support is responsive and knowledgeable, very eager to help solve your immediate problems.
  • SignalFX integrations is vast and constantly growing, making adoption easy even when multiple different open-source technologies are used in your stack.
Read full review

Cons

IBM

  • 24/7 customer support
  • some times old data are not showed. need immediate support
Read full review

Splunk

  • Better integration with our clients (native mobile clients SDKs will be great).
  • A way to easily tag filters and move them across metrics/formula.
  • Alert system to easy false [alarm] and hard to configure.
  • Be able to have group more dimensions (and have more values on each).
Read full review

Pricing Details

Instana

Starting Price

$75 per month per host

Editions & Modules

Instana editions and modules pricing
EditionModules
Self-Hosted$93.801
SaaS$752

Footnotes

  1. per month per host
  2. per month per host

Offerings

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Entry-level set up fee?

No setup fee

Additional Details

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Starting Price

$15 per month

Editions & Modules

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Pricing

    Usability

    IBM

    No answers on this topic

    Splunk

    I find that learning the interface can take some time. We need a better show-and-tell on how the Teams pages, Dashboard Groups, Dashboards and charts delay. Advance SignalFlow is sometimes hard to build. Some better samples of advanced SignalFlow would be helpful. For example, Splunk SPL has a vast resource of examples.
    Read full review

    Support Rating

    IBM

    Website monitoring and application are very useful.we can able to see over all of the applications like calls, latency Erroneous Call Rate etc
    Read full review

    Splunk

    No answers on this topic

    Alternatives Considered

    IBM

    No answers on this topic

    Splunk

    They’re not for the same purpose but we’re using NewRelic and Honeycomb for monitoring purposes. NewRelic is used for HTTP client monitoring for system related throughput, error, database and external client monitoring. Honeycomb is used to monitor actual HTTP request/response values. Splunk [Infrastructure Monitoring] is used for real-time application related throughout and error monitoring.
    Read full review

    Professional Services

    IBM

    good debug tool for Kubernetes architecture
    Read full review

    Splunk

    No answers on this topic

    Return on Investment

    IBM

    • Avoid business impact
    Read full review

    Splunk

    • It has improved the Service Level Agreement.
    • The response time to resolve the issue has been decreased exponentially.
    • There is a new resolution category now i.e. zero call resolution which is a result of the AI-driven feature that helps resolve things before they really occur.
    Read full review

    Screenshots

    Add comparison