Lansweeper vs. Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Lansweeper
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Lansweeper - Network Discovery and IT Asset Management Software Lansweeper is an IT asset management solution that provides network…
$1
per year per asset
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft's System Center Operations Manager (SCOM) is a monitoring and application performance management option, with the core datacenter and cloud-based systems monitoring.N/A
Pricing
LansweeperMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Editions & Modules
Free (up to 100 assets)
$0
Enterprise
$1
per year per asset
Additional Help Desk Agents
$120
per year per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LansweeperMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LansweeperMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
LansweeperMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
IT Asset Management
Comparison of IT Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Lansweeper
8.0
12 Ratings
5% above category average
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
-
Ratings
Software and hardware inventory tracking8.012 Ratings00 Ratings
License management8.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset lifecycle monitoring8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset relationship management8.111 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Lansweeper
-
Ratings
Microsoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
6.1
22 Ratings
22% below category average
Application monitoring00 Ratings5.020 Ratings
Database monitoring00 Ratings9.022 Ratings
Threshold alerts00 Ratings10.022 Ratings
Predictive capabilities00 Ratings2.020 Ratings
Application performance management console00 Ratings3.019 Ratings
Collaboration tools00 Ratings6.017 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications00 Ratings4.020 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding00 Ratings4.018 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring00 Ratings7.020 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting00 Ratings8.021 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery00 Ratings5.018 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LansweeperMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Small Businesses
Atera
Atera
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LansweeperMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(14 ratings)
8.0
(25 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.9
(3 ratings)
7.3
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
LansweeperMicrosoft System Center Operations Manager (SCOM)
Likelihood to Recommend
Lansweeper
Lansweeper I believe is well suited for any environment - its low cost and small footprint make it an easy addition to any organization, big or small, that is looking for an asset inventory solution that can either replace or supplement existing asset management systems. It may not be well suited for situations where a lot of customization is necessary, such as pulling in custom fields or details from equipment that don't reside in a registry.
Read full review
Microsoft
More appropriate for:
  • Pure Microsoft ecosystem environments (Windows Server and SQL server) and the most common Linux and UNIX platforms.
  • Environments where cost is less of a factor than settling on a single platform for monitoring
  • Environments where the administrators are familiar with the setup and installation of SCOM.
Less appropriate for:
  • Pure UNIX/Linux shops, especially versions not supported out of the box by SCOM.
  • Shops that cannot afford the engagement to setup/configure and maintain on a continuous basis.
  • Shops that cannot dedicate personnel to the care and feeding of SCOM, especially when supporting larger environments.
Read full review
Pros
Lansweeper
  • Inventory - LANSweeper scans the network for devices - anything with an SNMP trap or using AD or local credentials. We can get an in-depth look at devices.
  • Reporting - LANSweeper can generate just about any report you can imagine. We can check RAM in groups and determine where upgrades are needed. We can find local printers (which aren't allowed on our network) and address that issue with the user. We can check CPU type to help determine end of life without our network.
  • Printers - It's nice to have a quick look at printer statuses. Toner levels, out of paper, and service errors are all reported via LANSweeper.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Allows us to visualize our systems in a single interface and see the status of health as well as relevant performance metrics.
  • A flexible and powerful interface with active alerting covering domain controllers, SQL servers, etc...
  • Allows you to customize your views and workspaces for specific tasks and needs.
  • Reporting is powerful and flexible.
Read full review
Cons
Lansweeper
  • Can only scan what it sees. Doesn't show every item on the machine. Patches are also absent.
  • Software Recognition is OK with Microsoft. It is dire within our network of multiple products. Recognition is at about 35% with constant manual work needed to baseline for each manufacturer in each network
  • Datacenter compliance is a manual project. We used Excel extensively.
  • License optimization is limited to installations v surplus licenses. We need to know who's using what and how.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • One of the biggest drawbacks to SCOM is the sheer scope and complexity of the system. This can be a pro and a con. The system is very customizable, what you put into it is what you'll get out of it. That said, the learning curve is fairly steep. An organization needs to be committed to putting time and resources into SCOM to get the most out of it. I've heard stories from colleagues of several different companies that invested in SCOM and then abandoned it due to the excessive time and care required.
  • SCOM is expensive. Not only is the enterprise licensing costly, SCOM requires it's own servers, operational and warehouse databases to be maintained.
  • The OOB SCOM reports are a bit clunky and feel outdated.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Lansweeper
The price to function scale is so far towards function it would be stupid to get rid of it
Read full review
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Lansweeper
Lots of info online there are tons of SQL Reports you can copy from the web as Lansweeper and users post many of them. They also send out alerts that pop up on Lansweeper, letting you know of an update that you need for certain software and provide an SQL report so you can scan your system to see what PCs need this update.
Read full review
Microsoft
Hard to get support. The product is not being actively developed anymore, so it is hard to get new features for the product.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Lansweeper
Microsoft System Center needs to install agents on all IT asset for discovery and sometimes the agents can easily get corrupted. Lansweeper is a SaaS solution and it's easier to deploy to all IT asset that are connected to the network. This save us a lot of deployment time without the need to engage vendor for professional service.
Read full review
Microsoft
We used Altiris and WSUS and in the beginning Altiris had the better admin interface than SCOM, but it is no longer the case as SCOM has refined their admin interface. Altiris still has better and more robust group assignments for management roles and those two other tools can better manage non Windows OS devices than SCOM but for a large enterprise Windows shop, if you can afford it, SCOM is the way to go.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Lansweeper
  • It had a positive impact on solutions expense cause several teams we're using different solutions with different costs that used several servers and DB resources. Now, we've been able to simply that a lot with Lansweeper.
  • With my previous point, people had to train and learn about each of their solutions. Now we can put a team in charge and so the other teams can focus on other tasks.
  • Last year Lansweeper changed their licencing prices a lot so it slashed our budget.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It has allowed us to provide an Enterprise Event/Alert management solution to the Global company
  • It has taken a long time to get it to provide valuable alerts and information, lots of user resources and investment.
  • It assists with 24/7 monitoring and out of hours support
Read full review
ScreenShots

Lansweeper Screenshots

Screenshot of Lansweeper Cloud IT DashboardScreenshot of Cloud Asset Summary PageScreenshot of On-premise Asset Summary PageScreenshot of Asset History PageScreenshot of AD User ReportScreenshot of Switch Asset Page