Merative Clinical Development vs. Q-Centrix
Merative Clinical Development vs. Q-Centrix
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Merative Clinical Development | N/A | IBM Clinical Development (formerly eClinicalOS) is a cloud-based electronic data capture (EDC) system. | N/A | |
Q-Centrix | N/A | Q-Centrix's mission is to allow for more efficient care of patients at the highest level of quality by giving hospitals visibility into outcomes so they can define a clear path to improved processes and enable better outcomes across the enterprise. They provide the tools to drive collaboration across departments, gain system-wide visibility, standardize internal data, and share benchmarks to drive performance, allow for quicker process improvements, and drive higher-level quality and operational… | N/A |
Merative Clinical Development | Q-Centrix | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | Subscription - For larger organizations and those who need a predictable budget. Most modules included without incurring additional fees. Eligible for volume discounts. Pay per use - For organizations that need flexibility without a long term contractual commitment. Transparent a la carte pricing, no minimums. Fees start when trial goes live. | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Merative Clinical Development | Q-Centrix | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros | No answers on this topic | |
Top Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
Merative Clinical Development | Q-Centrix | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 8.4 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 8.2 (19 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Availability | 8.2 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 8.6 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 8.2 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 8.2 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Merative Clinical Development | Q-Centrix | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Pros | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Cons | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Likelihood to Renew | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Usability | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Reliability and Availability | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Performance | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Online Training | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Implementation Rating | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | Merative | Q-Centrix No answers on this topic |
ScreenShots | Merative Clinical Development Screenshots |