PingOne from Ping Identity vs. Symantec IGA

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
PingOne from Ping Identity
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT environments, it can be…
$20,000
per year
Symantec IGA
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Symantec IGA (formerly Layer7 Identity Suite & CA Identity Suite) from Broadcom provides comprehensive identity management and governance capabilities. In addition, Symantec IGA performs risk analysis and certification and enables remediation actions in real-time during the access provisioning steps, thereby improving audit performance and risk posture with preventive policy enforcement.N/A
Pricing
PingOne from Ping IdentitySymantec IGA
Editions & Modules
Essential
$20,000
per year
Plus
$40,000
per year
Premium
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PingOne from Ping IdentitySymantec IGA
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PingOne from Ping IdentitySymantec IGA
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
PingOne from Ping IdentitySymantec IGA
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
PingOne from Ping Identity
6.5
7 Ratings
21% below category average
Symantec IGA
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control8.85 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.97 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management8.85 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning1.64 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation2.33 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management4.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
PingOne from Ping IdentitySymantec IGA
Small Businesses
Dashlane
Dashlane
Score 9.2 out of 10
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
The Okta Identity Cloud
The Okta Identity Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Imprivata OneSign
Imprivata OneSign
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
PingOne from Ping IdentitySymantec IGA
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(8 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
PingOne from Ping IdentitySymantec IGA
Likelihood to Recommend
Ping Identity
Really like [this] solution, it fits our requirements 100%. There are unlimited possibilities to extend the product, either by creating additional adapters or selectors. We really like the policy management level in PingFederate. It's extremely helpful when we can specify customer journey per many different requirements like user location, application type etc. As well, both StepUp and TopDown authentication flows were implemented [easily].
Read full review
Broadcom
If an organization is looking for a good comprehensive identity management/governance suite that is easy to implement, CA identity manager may be a good/robust product. It is best to understand specific use case for your organization and try out the product before a final purchase decision as is the case with all sw products.
Read full review
Pros
Ping Identity
  • Based on open standards, we can use as much or as little of the Ping suite as we like, depending on which other technologies we've already implemented.
  • Continuous innovation and product enhancements have ensured their products continue to meet our rapidly evolving needs.
  • Ping Identity has been an outstanding partner, starting with the RFP process and continuing to this day, years after the sale. They are focused on our success at every level of the company and are highly responsive to our needs, issues, and product suggestions.
Read full review
Broadcom
  • It has complete identity management and governance capabilities equipped with a simple, intuitive user experience and helps simplify processes such as user access requests and access certifications. This in turn helps in improved productivity and user satisfaction.
Read full review
Cons
Ping Identity
  • solution has some propriety solution which is hard to customize
  • doesn't support all workflow and hooks
  • solution has aged and not all configuration are supported
Read full review
Broadcom
  • Bringing on new users and removing existing user when new employee/contractors join or leave an organization can be improved by linking directly to HR module.
  • The slightly complicated GUI makes drill down difficult for a new user.
Read full review
Usability
Ping Identity
Easy to use; all UI's are user friendly and easy to learn.[The] possibility to use API is [a] big value as well. We really like integration with CyberArk; with it we can manage privileged accounts according to company standards without breaking any rules, and we can be 100% sure that only approved persons will have administrative access.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Ping Identity
Ping's support is willing and attentive, but if I am in a position to engage them I am often at a point where most of the usual support engineers would not be in a position to answer the questions I have. However, Ping has been more than willing to engage their product and development teams with our organization as we take advanced deployment and use case challenges to them.
Read full review
Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Ping Identity
Two-way authentication and ease of use. I've used several applications that just email a link but never ask for a verification code. By entering the verification code you are sure that the site is safe, secured, and reliable. Using Ping, we can ensure no one other than you will access the application using your credential as you can log in only after you confirm using the verification code that you receive on your personal email or device.
Read full review
Broadcom
The final contenders were CA and Oracle - Oracle was tedious to implement and maintain while on the other hand CA was easy to implement and maintain and came at a much lower price.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Ping Identity
  • it is positive with saving the cost
  • some drawback with aging solution
  • directory is solid and provide lots of cost saving
Read full review
Broadcom
  • For us, it was a fairly easy implementation over 60 day period that provided ROI fairly quickly
Read full review
ScreenShots