SMSAPI vs. Waterfall

We use SMSAPI in our client's projects. Mainly it is useful for sending urgent notifications ex. Action required from the user. Moreover, its use as remarketing channel for registered users that not decided to purchase or as promotional offers with additional items on sale or discounts.

Incentivized

For large organizations that are looking to build big, robust SMS programs and want the benefit of a CRM back-end for managing users and messaging.

Incentivized

• Easy integration with API.
• Two main methods of showing sender in inbox.
• Sending SMS from application.

Incentivized

• Customer service. You have your own point of contact. They are very supportive and helpful. They always respond quickly.
• Their deep non-profit discount.
• Their message schedules. Very flexible and it can be a relative schedule to say a pregnant woman's due date and someone's goal date for quit smoking, etc.

Incentivized

• Everything is ok.

Incentivized

• Some features require additional cost. The nature of growth means the product becomes more expensive and that is a problem for some buyers.

Incentivized

We use SMSAPI because we have recommendations from trusted sources about this solution. As for now, everything is great. It works as supposed and fulfills all requirements.

Incentivized

We had EZTexting before. They don't have relative scheduling message so we had to switch to another vendor. We checked into SMS Magic, but they were not very responsive to our sales inquiry and then we received some phone call from India from someone who's very hard to communicate with.

Incentivized

• Boost CTR & sales.
• Helps with abandoned baskets.
• Improves UX and engagement.

Incentivized

• We have worked with several clients to help them launch and grow their SMS program and the platform helps us doing cutting edge work in this space.

Incentivized