Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points you dreamed of!
Updated February 08, 2024
Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points you dreamed of!
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Modules Used
- Cisco Catalyst 9120 Access Points
- Cisco Catalyst 9115 Access Points
- Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points
Cisco Access Point
We are running hundreds of Cisco access points . We are using it to provide reliable access to sdwan and internet services. We are utilizing following models: 9115, 9120, 3802, 2802 in flexconnect mode. Using local switching and local authentication in any location. We are supporting sites with Meraki wifi solutions.
- Catalyst 9115i
- Catalysts 9120i
- Aironet 3802
- Aironet 2802
- MR55
- Packet capture on Meraki APs - missing both direction
- Sniffer mode on 9120 not working well with 9800 controller
- Increased performance of ax ssids
- Flexibility with azure wireless controllers 9800cl
- Meraki decreased our troubleshooting options
We don't use zero touch. We are utilizing DHCP options for deployment services. Site tagging is preconfigured before deployment- this allows to limit configuration time to a minimum (minutes). The most time consuming is the image upgrade in the new deployment offices. Additionally doing the phy work extends the deployment time.
Wlc allows to calculate the proper power levels with rrn technology. Properly adjust tpc make the cell big enough or helps to identify the wrongly deployed wifi topologies.
We are migrating from Aironet platform to Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points. That's more flexible, and we do it to sync switching, SDWAN, and wifi under one family.
Do you think Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Catalyst 9100 Access Points again?
Yes