Genesys Cloud CX Review
Overall Satisfaction with Genesys Cloud CX
We have actually been on the engaged platform for several years now, close to 15 years. So one of the things with the Engage platform is we lack the ability to innovate rapidly. With Genesys Cloud, not only did we have an old infrastructure that we needed to migrate over and that needed to be maintained, but we were through actually upgrading our Genesys engage platform, and we migrated to the cloud so that we didn't have to take care of the maintenance of all those servers. We had a lot of cost savings with getting rid of hardware infrastructure by moving to the cloud. That was one of the pain points. Also moving to Genesys Cloud CX actually improved our agent productivity by a lot, so that was one of the key drivers.
Pros
- Architect, which is a Genesys flow designing tool. A lot of the architect flows could be done with a lot of ease compared to our Genesys Engage platform. From a design standpoint, we really like that platform and the Genesys admin tool where everything can be done within the Genesys admin tool itself be it workforce management, be it configuring user profiles. A lot of that stuff can be automated. A lot of the integrations could be done much more efficiently by using the App Foundry, things like that. So it's a lot of automation with Genesys Cloud that we never had in Genesys Engage.
Cons
- As far as missing functionality or hard to use, I think a better job could be done with the roles and permissions feature of Genesys Cloud CX, even though it's actually much more simplified than Genesys Engage. I think the scope for improvement, because it can get confusing at times as to what roles or permissions could be provided for a particular user or for a particular product that is being used, or so it could get a bit confusing. I think that could be improved.
- Cost savings-wise, I think our abandonment rate has actually gone down drastically with moving to Genesys Cloud CX.
- First-call resolution has gone up quite a bit by using Genesys Cloud CX. Even the number of tickets, to be honest, has come down. We have to handle on a day-to-day basis, which is cost savings by itself, which which leads to agent productivity. So all of those are beneficial.
The migration process to Genesys Cloud CX has been pretty simple. Provided we kind of have the right requirements laid out and all that. So the knowledge of the product, while it's actually pretty easy to get started using like I said, architect and stuff, there is some bit of a learning curve that needs to happen. It's much more rapid than in Genesys Engage.
- Five9 and NICE CXone
We actually evaluated quite a few products before we moved to Genesys Cloud CX. We had a vendor selection process which went for about six months, and it was pretty rigorous. Five9 was one of them. I think we didn't check out Topdesk so that they were out of the picture, but I think Nice inContact was also there as part of that. So those were the two top contenders. We like Genesys for their workforce management. Five9 - I think they were using some age-old software, to be honest, that was not as automated as Genesys, so we liked it.
Do you think Genesys Cloud CX delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Genesys Cloud CX's feature set?
Yes
Did Genesys Cloud CX live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Genesys Cloud CX go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Genesys Cloud CX again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation