Overall Satisfaction with Litmus
Primarily used as a last check for how built emails are rendered across different devices and ISP's
- Identifies broken/misaligned images in emails
- Identifies HTML problems that aren't readily apparent in testing
- Identifies spam flags
- Email proofs can't be edited for analysis (eg, subject lines can't be evaluated properly when CRM includes test language)
- Not all HTML issues are flagged accurately - sometimes emails look good in litmus but are flagged by recipients as broken
- Additional information on errors, like a source code viewer to highlight HTML errors, would be helpful
- The primary positive impact of using Litmus is avoiding 98% of errors - broken images or links, etc, - in our outgoing emails
We don't use this feature.
We don't use this feature.
We don't use this feature - the review process involves too many people for it to be cost effective to license them all for Litmus
Do you think Litmus delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Litmus's feature set?
Yes
Did Litmus live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Litmus go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Litmus again?
Yes