OpenHire
August 31, 2014

OpenHire

Oksana Lukash, PHR, CCP (ksusha45@yahoo.com) | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Software Version

NA

Modules Used

  • OpenHire
  • RedCarpet
  • WingSpan

Overall Satisfaction with OpenHire

OpenHire was used across the whole organization to manage our recruiting process. It took a manual process and automated it. OpenHire was easy to implement, easy to use, pretty intuitive and did not require a lot of maintenance or support. The program made the approval process easy and managers were able to do it on the go. All the candidates were in one place and it was easy to manage the positions from opening to closing.
  • Easy to implement
  • User friendly and intuitive
  • Cost efficient
  • Helpful customer service
  • After the position was closed, the candidates associated with that role went into a general folder of "past candidates", they were no longer associated with the role.
  • Better customer service from HR, the tool gave us ability to notify every candidate of where they were in the process, this was not possible when the process was manual
  • Made HR more efficient, by having the information at our finger tips, giving us the ability to run metrics and reports during the time that the company more than doubled in time.
OpenHire is more straight forward because it caters to smaller organizations and does not have the features that Oracle does. Oracle takes longer to open a position and go through the process because it is geared to larger organizations that have different requirements and reporting obligations. OpenHire was easy to implement as well.
It was a great solution for the company in all aspects, especially the cost. The company was not in a position to afford a solution such as Oracle PeopleSoft. The only reason we did not renew OpenHire was we got acquired by a much larger organization and started utilizing the tools that the parent company had available.
I believe OpenHire is a great solution for small to medium sized company and might not be a best fit for a large organization.