Overall Satisfaction with Request Metrics
We're building a new client dashboard for managing our project work, assets, designs, and progress. It needs to be fast, flashy, and bug-free, as it's how our reputation will be seen by clients. We use Request Metrics to make sure the dashboard remains fast for our clients.
It is used by our team of 3 engineers to see the performance of the site for our clients.
It is used by our team of 3 engineers to see the performance of the site for our clients.
- Performance charts are really simple and easy for us to understand what is happening
- It was easy to get started and doesn't need administration or training
- It's affordable for our team
- It's fast
- I wish that it could also do uptime checking of the site
- There is not enough detail to drill into individual users
- The launch of our project dashboard was much smoother and more successful because we could fix problems earlier
- It fit without our existing operations budget
We also consider Speedcurve and Calibre for monitoring. Speedcurve was really nice, but the reports were slow. We had to wait a lot to get information. It was also out of our budget and would require extra justification to use it.
Calibre was also nice, but the numbers were based on synthetic rather than real user performance. We felt that this wasn't as helpful for us.
Calibre was also nice, but the numbers were based on synthetic rather than real user performance. We felt that this wasn't as helpful for us.
Do you think Request Metrics delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Request Metrics's feature set?
Yes
Did Request Metrics live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Request Metrics go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Request Metrics again?
Yes