TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Adobe Target vs. Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) vs. Optimizely Web Experimentation

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Adobe Target

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAdobe Test and Target is an A/B, multi-variate testing platform which Adobe acquired as part of the Omniture platform in 2009. It is now part of the Adobe Marketing Cloud. It offers tight integration with Adobe analytics and content management products.N/A

    Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)

    Score6.7 out of 10
    N/ALiferay Digital Experience Platform is an enterprise-grade platform that enables companies to create and connect personalized digital experiences across web, mobile, social, in store and other touchpoints. It provides the technical foundation (deep integration, security and modularity) for a digital business to orchestrate unique customer experiences, as well as business value features to support a deeper understanding of their customers.N/A

    Optimizely Web Experimentation

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AWhether launching a first test or scaling a sophisticated experimentation program, Optimizely Web Experimentation aims to deliver the insights needed to craft high-performing digital experiences that drive engagement, increase conversions, and accelerate growth.N/A
    Pricing
    Adobe TargetLiferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Adobe TargetLiferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Free Trial
    NoYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsEmail sales@liferay.com for pricing information.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Adobe TargetLiferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Considered Multiple Products
    Adobe
    Chose Adobe Target
    For us, the decision was very straightforward. We chose to invest in the Adobe stack and utilize tools that are developed to integrate together and complement each other. Ex: Adobe Target 'A4T' integration within Adobe Analytics. Optimizely appears to be a great tool, but …
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Target
    Previously, we had the opportunity to work with some similar services and to be honest we had a disastrous experience because they were not what we were looking for, but since Adobe Target was implemented it has proven to be a highly professional service for our company.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Target
    In my personal opinion, Optimizely is a clear choice here while Google Optimize is for the low-budget minded decision-makers and Evergage for the COE more geared toward personalization; however, in our case we were already locked into using Target prior to my arrival. I don't …
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Target
    I have used Optimizely for A/B testing. Optimizely makes it easier to set up almost any type of testing experiment. Optimizely is also strongly recommended for a limited number of users and when you want to optimize the cost. Optimizely was selected over Adobe Target since the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Target
    We seriously considered another software but because we use so many other Adobe products this made the most sense for us. If you are not dependent on other Adobe software and are a smaller company, in my opinion, Target may not be the best fit.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Target
    Target has far superior functionality, it integrates with Adobe Analytics and is easy to build tests.
    Incentivized
    Chose Adobe Target
    We have looked at Optimizely but at this point are sticking with Test & Target. We like the integration it has with our Analytics tools such as Ad Hoc and SiteCatalyst. Also, we feel that Adobe has some interesting products that we would like to dig into in the future such as …
    Chose Adobe Target
    While my organization has been using Adobe Test & Target, I have had the chance to evaluate Optimizely, another tool that allows for multivariate testing with a smooth interface. The reason I like to stick with Adobe Test & Target is its ability to interface and interact with …
    Liferay, Inc.
    No answer on this topic
    Optimizely
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    It's a lot more, well, site stacked, it's way better than that. Adobe Target. I think the UI is easier to use on Optimizely. The one thing that I would say comparatively is our analytics talking to each other. Obviously Adobe, we use Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target, so they …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optimizely is more user-friendly and cost-effective, ideal for experimentation-focused teams, while Adobe Target excels in advanced personalization and seamless integration within the Adobe ecosystem, making it better suited for large enterprises.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Google Optimize was much less flexible for our program needs and requires Google Analytics for analysis and metrics tracking. Optimizely Web Experimentation lets you build any number of metrics which can be much more complex than standard GA goals. Optimizely Web …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    We use AEM so Adobe Target would be a natural choice, it integrates naturally with the Experience Fragments and all the content we already hold there. However - with extensions - we've been able to unlock a similar workflow to be able to seamlessly test. Optimizely has the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optimizely Web Experimentation and Adobe Target are both powerful tools for website optimization and experimentation, but they differ in some key ways. Here's a comparison of some of the most important features of each platform:A/B testing: Both Optimizely and Adobe Target
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optimizely Web Experimentation stacks up favorably against Adobe Target, Kameleoon, and Oracle CX Marketing in terms of ease of use, customer service, and features. It is easy to set up and execute experiments, the customer service team is always quick to respond to any …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optimizely is the leader but Google Optimize and Adobe Target are up and coming given their ability to integrate with those marketing stacks.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Adobe Target, VWO and Google Optimize are often the three that come up against Optimizely from an agency recommendation perspective. The first, because Adobe Target is a comparable enterprise optimization platform; the second, because it's a paid but has a much more achievable …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Maxymiser - The statistical significance engine used by Optimizely helps to reduce the detection of false positives. These were noticed on many occasions within the maxymiser tool.

    Adobe Target - The ease of use is non-comparable between Optimizely and Adobe Target. The UI of Ad…
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    I have used tools in various spaces that have all the flashy bells and whistles, and is, but lacks some basic features - Optimizely isn't this. While other tools, such as Adobe Target, Evergage, Dynamic Yield, Google Optimize, or even Taplytics may make more sense for your …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    We were a former Adobe Test and Target client and felt that the tool was not keeping up with the competition. Optimizely greatly streamlined the process of setting up and running A/B tests, making results easy to understand, and provided superior customer service. I understand T…
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    I think that Optimizely Web Experimentation is much easier to implement and use, but the entire Adobe Experience Cloud provides a ton of value if you have multiple products.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optimizely is my favorite due to its ease of use and exceptional testing capabilities. It is not the cheapest tool, but the other tools that could be compared are not cheap—you get what you pay for. Some of the smaller tools are making gains, though!
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    > Adobe's pretty cool for its recomentation / AI / ML engine > VWO's wysiwyg is pretty solid and the heatmapping is nice > abtasty's consent features are pretty cool to launch patch and AB Test Consent Rate > Monetate & Dynamic Yield's pre-built personalization features help …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Analytics are vastly superior, platform UI is by far the easiest to use, and capabilities are best in class. If your organization has any budget for a web experimentation tool, it should be using Optimizely Web Experimentation.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    unbounce's Visual Editor is what I'd expect out of Optimizely Web Experimentation, but I believe it's missing. Otherwise, Optimizely Web Experimentation is better.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Better documentation releases new features and a better UI experience.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optimizely is ok and cost effective compared to other tools. In general the industry keeps lowering the value of tools as they broaden the audience.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    It's more robust and capable.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optimizely is easily a top 3 platform, depending on your other MarTech will determine if its the best tool for you.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    I think that Optimizely is more user-friendly than Adobe and Monetate, for example - Adobe is really suited for people with deep pockets and a distinct technical acumen that may not be suitable for a small business. Montetate is not user-friendly - even for seasoned marketers. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    We selected Target, as it has more advanced functionality and integrates with Analytics.
    Incentivized
    Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Optimizely's community is definitely more active, and resourceful. The platform is also more user-friendly so that members of other departments can review collected data, or results. Optimizely was chosen due to its efficiency, simplicity, and pricing. It was also great to read …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    15 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Would buy again
    89 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    86%
    Delivers good value for the price
    12 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    69 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    89%
    Happy with the feature set
    16 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    89 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    75%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    52 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    47%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    87%
    Implementation went as expected
    58 Answers
    Features
    Adobe TargetLiferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Testing and Experimentation
    Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Adobe Target and Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.0
    18 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)
    -
    Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    8.0
    163 Ratings
    5% below category average
    a/b experiment testing9.318 Ratings00 Ratings9.0163 Ratings
    Split URL testing8.617 Ratings00 Ratings8.5135 Ratings
    Multivariate testing7.817 Ratings00 Ratings8.4139 Ratings
    Multi-page/funnel testing8.314 Ratings00 Ratings7.9126 Ratings
    Cross-browser testing8.39 Ratings00 Ratings8.197 Ratings
    Mobile app testing8.57 Ratings00 Ratings8.075 Ratings
    Test significance8.415 Ratings00 Ratings8.4147 Ratings
    Visual / WYSIWYG editor7.315 Ratings00 Ratings8.1133 Ratings
    Advanced code editor6.414 Ratings00 Ratings7.9125 Ratings
    Page surveys8.77 Ratings00 Ratings6.217 Ratings
    Visitor recordings8.59 Ratings00 Ratings8.418 Ratings
    Preview mode8.116 Ratings00 Ratings7.6145 Ratings
    Test duration calculator7.916 Ratings00 Ratings7.9112 Ratings
    Experiment scheduler8.315 Ratings00 Ratings8.2112 Ratings
    Experiment workflow and approval7.612 Ratings00 Ratings7.890 Ratings
    Dynamic experiment activation7.412 Ratings00 Ratings7.574 Ratings
    Client-side tests7.915 Ratings00 Ratings7.896 Ratings
    Server-side tests7.410 Ratings00 Ratings7.250 Ratings
    Mutually exclusive tests7.816 Ratings00 Ratings8.280 Ratings
    Audience Segmentation & Targeting
    Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Adobe Target and Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.2
    18 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)
    -
    Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    8.2
    152 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Standard visitor segmentation7.918 Ratings00 Ratings8.4147 Ratings
    Behavioral visitor segmentation7.417 Ratings00 Ratings7.6122 Ratings
    Traffic allocation control8.418 Ratings00 Ratings9.1144 Ratings
    Website personalization9.216 Ratings00 Ratings7.8111 Ratings
    Results and Analysis
    Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Adobe Target and Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) and Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Feature
    Adobe Target
    8.0
    18 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)
    -
    Ratings
    Optimizely Web Experimentation
    8.3
    149 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Heatmap tool7.58 Ratings00 Ratings9.313 Ratings
    Click analytics7.515 Ratings00 Ratings8.833 Ratings
    Scroll maps8.88 Ratings00 Ratings8.517 Ratings
    Form fill analysis8.28 Ratings00 Ratings8.072 Ratings
    Conversion tracking8.515 Ratings00 Ratings8.744 Ratings
    Goal tracking8.117 Ratings00 Ratings8.2127 Ratings
    Test reporting7.918 Ratings00 Ratings7.9137 Ratings
    Results segmentation8.316 Ratings00 Ratings7.7103 Ratings
    CSV export8.115 Ratings00 Ratings7.9102 Ratings
    Experiments results dashboard7.218 Ratings00 Ratings8.049 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Adobe TargetLiferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Small Businesses
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Adobe TargetLiferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.4
    (46 ratings)
    8.0
    (5 ratings)
    8.7
    (254 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.3
    (24 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.5
    (51 ratings)
    Usability
    8.1
    (14 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (58 ratings)
    Availability
    6.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    3.5
    (9 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (16 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    7.2
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (11 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (163 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Adobe TargetLiferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)Optimizely Web Experimentation
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Adobe
    If you're using the Adobe stack and tools to power your website, Target is a great solution to implement. I've utilized Target within two organizations, one running on Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), and the other on Adobe Magento. I don't see how companies could harness the full capacity of Target without also having Adobe Analytics integrated. This is their 'secret sauce' and might not be a good solution for companies who are invested in Google Analytics 360. Integration was straightforward but did require support from the Adobe team to implement successfully. While Target is a great tool for digital teams to support, you'll need your tech team aligned and available to support implementation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    Liferay Portal is a framework which comes with a fine grained security/permission model, (Web) Content Management, Authentication and Authorization, outbox portlets with different features to manage content or users. So if any business application has below questions then I can recommend not to use Liferay as a platform.
    • Application is big but not content or user driven.
    • Application with few static contents.
    • Application with batch transactions(DB) i.e. insert , update db records in batch.
    • Application with ERP capabilities.
    • Application with Big Data support.
    Read full review
    Optimizely
    I think it can serve the whole spectrum of experiences from people who are just getting used to web experimentation. It's really easy to pick up and use. If you're more experienced then it works well because it just gets out of the way and lets you really focus on the experimentation side of things. So yeah, strongly recommend. I think it is well suited both to small businesses and large enterprises as well. I think it's got a really low barrier to entry. It's very easy to integrate on your website and get results quickly. Likewise, if you are a big business, it's incrementally adoptable, so you can start out with one component of optimizing and you can build there and start to build in things like data CMS to augment experimentation as well. So it's got a really strong a pathway to grow your MarTech platform if you're a small company or a big company.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Adobe
    • This application gives us an incredible integration with Adobe Analytics that allows its operation to be the best and determine the performance of our website.
    • It offers us an analysis based on user behavior and a web page customization option to adapt and meet the needs of those users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    • Personalization
    • Business to client relationship
    • Customer management is better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Optimizely
    • The Platform contains drag-and-drop editor options for creating variations, which ease the A/B tests process, as it does not require any coding or development resources.
    • Establishing it is so simple that even a non-technical person can do it perfectly.
    • It provides real-time results and analytics with robust dashboard access through which you can quickly analyze how different variations perform. With this, your team can easily make data-driven decisions Fastly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Adobe
    • This is something a lot of testing tools struggle with, but I think the WYSIWYG ("What you see is what you get") editor - or Visual Experience Composer (VEC) in Adobe terminology - could definitely use some work. It's a struggle to execute many tests beyond simple copy, color, placement changes, and even the features that do exist are often clunky if not altogether broken.
    • The interface itself can be a bit counterintuitive in certain parts. If you are familiar with other tools, it's likely middle of the road in this respect; think much easier to understand than Monetate for instance, but a far cry from the simplicity of an Optimizely.
    • It can be a bit buggy from time to time. The worst example is the frequency at which the tool will fail to save due to an error, but not inform you of this until you try to save, at which point your only option is to log out, log back in, and make all of your updates once again. It can become an extreme pain point at times, and I personally have just gotten into the habit of saving every couple of minutes to avoid a massive loss of productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    • Harder to get started
    • Enterprise level of options can cause confusion
    • Development documentation could be better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Optimizely
    • JavaScript is hard to implement sometimes especially for JQuery elements
    • ROI reporting should be part of the overall experimentation reporting
    • CMP integration: where we can easily show status of test on the HPT request
    • CMS integration
    • More widgets like social proof banners, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Adobe
    We have a team of people trained on how to use the application and it integrates well with the other Adobe products we use. Our future roadmap of testing will require some complex scenarios which we hope Target will be able to accomplish
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    We are currently using Liferay Portal and plan to keep using it.
    Read full review
    Optimizely
    I rated this question because at this stage, Optimizely does most everything we need so I don't foresee a need to migrate to a new tool. We have the infrastructure already in place and it is a sizeable lift to pivot to another tool with no guarantee that it will work as good or even better than Optimizely
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Adobe
    The recent UI update is a complete mess. It is difficult to navigate and find features that previously existed. The reactiveness of the page depending on window size is also ridiculous and it is absurd that depending on how large your window is, entire columns of functions will disappear with no indication that they are missing. The usability of the tool has fallen off a cliff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    Optimizely Web Experimentation's visual editor is handy for non-technical or quick iterative testing. When it comes to content changes it's as easy as going into wordpress, clicking around, and then seeing your changes live--what you see is what you get. The preview and approval process for sharing built experiments is also handy for sharing experiments across teams for QA purposes or otherwise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Adobe
    i don't think we use the full functionalities of the tool, but to use the full functions, it's almost impossible (Too hard)
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's availability as a 10 out of 10. The software is reliable and does not experience any application errors or unplanned outages. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Adobe
    The bottleneck is never the software program
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's performance as a 9 out of 10. Pages load quickly, reports are complete in a reasonable time frame, and the software does not slow down any other software or systems that it integrates with. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Adobe
    On several occasions, we have had the need to ask for help from the Adobe Target support team, and I must say that they have provided us with an excellent experience, as they take care of solving the problems quickly and with high precision
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    They always are quick to respond, and are so friendly and helpful. They always answer the phone right away. And [they are] always willing to not only help you with your problem, but if you need ideas they have suggestions as well.
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Adobe
    The instructor that came to train us was awesome and this training was very useful. I would recommend it for anyone who is going to be using this software. I only mark it lower because it is an added expense to an already expensive product, and a lot of the training covered the "Target" portion of the software (which again, we didn't use)
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Adobe
    The training was very easy to understand, however it would have been more useful to my development team than me. It was also primarily over-the-phone, which is never as easy to follow as in-person. We ended up scheduling and paying for an in-person training session to supplement the online/phone training because it wasn't helpful enough.
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    The tool itself is not very difficult to use so training was not very useful in my opinion. It did not also account for success events more complex than a click (which my company being ecommerce is looking to examine more than a mere click).
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Adobe
    Implement using a global mBox on the page so you can change any and everything over the traditional method. Traditional method is good if you do not have technical web dev resources, do not know Javascript/jQuery, or you have money to blow on mBox calls. Global deployment reduces mBox calls and allows you to touch many parts of the page easily. A lot more customizable
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    In retrospect: - I think I should have stressed more demo's / workshopping with the Optimizely team at the start. I felt too confident during demo stages, and when came time to actually start, I was a bit lost. (The answer is likely I should have had them on-hand for our first install.. they offered but I thought I was OK.) - Really getting an understanding / asking them prior to install of how to make it really work for checkout pages / one that uses dynamic content or user interaction to determine what the UI does. Could have saved some time by addressing this at the beginning, as some things we needed to create on our site for Optimizely to "use" as a trigger for the variation test. - Having a number of planned/hoped-for tests already in-hand before working with Optimizely team. Sharing those thoughts with them would likely have started conversations on additional things we needed to do to make them work (rather than figuring that out during the actual builds). Since I had development time available, I could have added more things to the baseline installation since my developers were already "looking under the hood" of the site.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Adobe
    We seriously considered another software but because we use so many other Adobe products this made the most sense for us. If you are not dependent on other Adobe software and are a smaller company, in my opinion, Target may not be the best fit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) feels more professional than other similar products I tried or used. With this, I mainly mean the look or aspect when you are editing, setting or configuring anything in the platform, wether you are setting users, roles, creating new pages, adding components to them, or even configuring server or instance related configurations.
    Read full review
    Optimizely
    The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you need to confidently make changes
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Adobe
    No answers on this topic
    Liferay, Inc.
    No answers on this topic
    Optimizely
    We can use it flexibly across lines of business and have it in use across two departments. We have different use cases and slightly different outcomes, but can unify our results based on impact to the bottom line. Finally, we can generate value from anywhere in the org for any stakeholders as needed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Adobe
    • We have been able to run specific A/B tests that have shown an increase in conversion, which in turn has led to very large banked sales numbers for the year.
    • We have been able to prove that using and automated Merchandising process did not decrease conversion. This allowed us to greatly increase efficiency by opening up resource time.
    Read full review
    Liferay, Inc.
    • Its high scalability and flexibility has allowed us to include all essential solutions to meet our business needs while preserving the originality of the brand and helping us to improve the quality of our processes and services within the same friendly and unified environment.
    • This powerful platform has allowed us to keep the efforts of all our units aligned, from sales, marketing, operations, support and customer service, in a solid collaborative environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Optimizely
    • We're able to share definitive annualized revenue projections with our team, showing what would happen if we put a test into Production
    • Showing the results of a test on a new page or feature prior to full implementation on a site saves developer time (if a test proves the new element doesn't deliver a significant improvement.
    • Making a change via the WYSIWYG interface allows us to see multiple changes without developer intervention.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) Screenshots

    Screenshot of Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) forms experience was designed to make generating forms simple and straightforward while offering flexibility and deep integration with back end systems.Screenshot of Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) was designed with usability and beauty in mind.Screenshot of Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) features a unified look and feel that makes site administration a breeze.Screenshot of Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) forms experience was designed to make generating forms simple and straightforward while offering flexibility and deep integration with back end systems.Screenshot of Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) comes with blogs out-of-the-box, designed to give enterprises a slick blogging experience similar to what they're used to with consumer platforms.Screenshot of Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP) was designed with usability and beauty in mind.

    Optimizely Web Experimentation Screenshots

    Screenshot of AI-Powered Experimentation with Opal:

- Instant Test Ideas: Generates high-quality A/B test ideas based on any goals and audience insights.
- Smarter Experimentation: The AI can suggest impactful variations, reducing guesswork and increasing test velocity.
- More Than Just Ideas: From hypothesis generation to analyzing results, Opal helps optimize every stage of the experimentation process.Screenshot of the new Visual Editor with an AI Variation Development Agent

Create simple or advanced website changes fast without writing a line of code with our AI Development Agent.

Use natural language to build out your ideas and apply brand styles to your experiments instantly.Screenshot of Advanced Audience Targeting:

- Delivers personalized experiences by targeting users based on behaviors, attributes, and real-time conditions.
- Defines precise audience segments using first-party data, geolocation, and device type.
- Can test and optimize for different audience groups to maximize impact and engagement.Screenshot of Variation Template

Library of experience templates that you can access right within the Visual Editor. Customize these templates or create your own to easily reuse throughout your experimentation program.

- Offers pre-built templates for common test setups.
- Standardized variations and maintains brand integrity with reusable templates.
- Templates can be customized visually or tweak them with code for full flexibility.Screenshot of Web Experimentation Results Page:

- Data visualizations help interpret experiment performance.
- Displays which variations are winning with built-in statistical significance calculations.
- Results can be filtered by audience segments, events, and conversions to uncover key trends.Screenshot of the custom code editor for JavaScript & CSS changes, used to build complex tests.