Likelihood to Recommend Android Studio is a great mobile development IDE. I have found it is the best for both Android and Flutter development. It is created by JetBrains, so any developer used to their products, such as
IntelliJ IDEA , will find themselves right at home with this IDE. It is very intuitive so it is a good choice for people needing to learn an IDE quickly.
Read full review Spyder is an open-source Python IDE designed for the movement of data science work. Spyder comes with an
Anaconda package manager distribution, so depending on your setup you may have installed it on your machine.
Spyder includes most of the "standard IDE" features you can expect, such as a strong syntax code editor, Python code rendering, and an integrated text browser.
Spyder is used when we want to develop a code that is useful and able to explore proper documentation of the code that has been written. We use Spyder to perform data-related operations like filtration, cleaning, and enhancing the data qualities. There some cases where it is less appropriate like working in an environment, creating dashboards of data visualizations and plots.
Read full review Pros Support for developing in either the emulator or a device means I can quickly diagnose platform specific issues The support for Kotlin and Java is stellar, with projects easily containing both types of code with ease Hot reload support means that I can quickly test changes without waiting for a length build and optimization process Excellent cross platform support means I can develop on macOS, Windows, or Linux without losing functionality between platforms Read full review Debugging of your existing code Generates figures very quickly as part of a figures tab which lets users understand results quickly Different layouts are available for the software which will give the users freedom to decide what layout works best for them Read full review Cons Android Studio needs a very high amount of RAM and a high-end processor to run smoothly, which can't be affordable for everyone. Updates in Gradle files can sometimes come up with a hectic improvement in whole code, which can lead us to improve some code and consume precious time. Multitasking is very difficult in Android Studio due to its heavy consumption of resources. Read full review Colors in code format Add a broadcast to share the project with friends Contains more than one important language such as Python Read full review Usability It is fairly straightforward to use. Pretty much good to go as soon as you install it. The IDE itself is very user friendly, and it is only limited by whatever limitations Python has as a language. Great for those who want to run their scripts quickly or do some Python programming without fussing.
Read full review Support Rating Overall support for Android Studio is quite good. As the project is maintained by Google itself, frequent updates are usually made to Android Studio to keep the IDE update and bug-free. Many community forums are also available to help developers across the world if they face any issue.
Read full review Most of data scientists or data engineers are either using ec2 on the cloud or
Atom or
PyCharm locally. It is a bit hard to find people who are still using Spyder and have the sight of the IDE and can help you to answer your question.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Android Studio is the best possible offering to make android based apps. It's a product by Google and the official integrated development environment for android app development. That's why it is able to offer the easiest to learn and simplest coding environment to developers. But it needs higher performance and is at times slower as compared to
Flutter , etc. So that's the only drawback, but overall it's better than most tools for app development.
Read full review I think Spyder doesn't stack up as well as other IDEs due to its many limitations. But it is available for free and that is one advantage it has over its competitors
Read full review Return on Investment The APPs developed with ANDROID STUDIO take a long time to develop, however this extra expense is compensated by the low rate of claims that our technical service must attend. By working with native code, you do not depend on external library providers and their associated cost. Jose Perri Director of Engineering and Product Development
Read full review Easy to use. Quick switch from R. Hard to manage env. Read full review ScreenShots