Apache CloudStack vs. Azure Cloud Services

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CloudStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
CloudStack is a cloud management platform, from Apache.N/A
Azure Cloud Services
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Azure Cloud Services is a cloud platform that enables users to create infinitely-scalable cloud applications and APIs. It enables users to build the web and cloud applications needed while also simplifying the management of applications with cloud services, and while ensuring high availability. Users can: scale an environment automatically based on demand and reduce costs, automate operating system and application updates to increase security, and take advantage of integrated health monitoring…
$0.02
per hour
Pricing
Apache CloudStackAzure Cloud Services
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CloudStackAzure Cloud Services
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache CloudStackAzure Cloud Services
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Apache CloudStackAzure Cloud Services
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Apache CloudStack
-
Ratings
Azure Cloud Services
9.1
3 Ratings
11% above category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings9.63 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings9.33 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings9.63 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings9.63 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings9.63 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache CloudStackAzure Cloud Services
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.5 out of 10
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
IBM Cloud Private
IBM Cloud Private
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache CloudStackAzure Cloud Services
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(3 ratings)
9.3
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache CloudStackAzure Cloud Services
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
Whether our clients are VPS hosting providers or operate private cloud infrastructure for their internal enterprise requirements, CloudStack provides solutions in an easy to implement and operate way that is simple to provide training for. The learning curve for our customesr adopting CloudStack for the management of their cloud infrastructure is shallow, enabling our clients to come up to speed quickly without having to outsource their administrative functions any longer than necessary
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Azure Cloud services is a good choice for hosting web applications, based on requirements it can be simple websites or complex web services as well as it provides automating application development and deployment pipeline. It's less appropriate in case of cost-effective option for organizations with tight budget constraints. For very basic static websites, Microsoft Azure's offerings might be seen as overkill.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Low-cost solution
  • Open-source
  • Engaged community
  • Solid documentation
  • Is a very reliable tool for orchestration with good usability
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Effective service management and performance monitoring capability.
  • Reliable security management with excellent access controls.
  • Best orchestration and easy configuration management.
  • Easy on compatibility testing and change management.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Sometimes you can find undocumented bugs that can compromise the entire infrastructure.
  • [If] you don't have an official support channel, you have try to find out the source of the problem by yourself.
  • Volume size limitation. Other players allow you to create volumes up to 64TB while ACS allows only 2TB volumes
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Just on Cloud deployment for those new to the platform.
  • Multiple data reports creation.
  • Migrating a large amount of data.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
The University, my first large implementation, had a big issue with 149 small data centers spread on São Paulo State, this data centers costs to university were very high, the consolidation idea in two data centers were awesome, but were worried with the management, so we adopted ACS to management of all 576 physical hosts. Now a days the university is delivering IaaS for all staff, students, teachers and researchers, they are using these resources to delivery services to their clients and have a great results in research area
Read full review
Microsoft
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Low-cost solution (free and open-source)
  • More than 2000 users using it simultaneously
  • Stable and reliable
  • Up and running since 2012
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Scalability
  • Cost savings
  • Integration and migration challenges
Read full review
ScreenShots