AppLovin Exchange (ALX) vs. YuMe

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AppLovin Exchange (ALX)
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
AppLovin is a mobile advertising optimization platform from the company of the same name headquartered in California.N/A
YuMe
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
YuMe is a provider of digital video brand advertising, now offered and supported by RhythmOne since the acquisition in early 2018. The platform is designed to simplify digital video advertising campaigns.N/A
Pricing
AppLovin Exchange (ALX)YuMe
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppLovin Exchange (ALX)YuMe
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppLovin Exchange (ALX)YuMe
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
AppLovin Exchange (ALX)YuMe
Small Businesses
Google AdMob
Google AdMob
Score 8.6 out of 10
Google Ad Manager
Google Ad Manager
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Yahoo Native
Yahoo Native
Score 6.7 out of 10
The Trade Desk
The Trade Desk
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Marin Software
Marin Software
Score 9.1 out of 10
Adobe Advertising Cloud
Adobe Advertising Cloud
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppLovin Exchange (ALX)YuMe
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(4 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppLovin Exchange (ALX)YuMe
Likelihood to Recommend
AppLovin
AppLovin is particularly well suited for gaming campaigns where it is really hard to reach users and you need formats like the rewarded video to keep users engaged with your ad. I would not recommend it for branding campaigns as their formats are more performance-focused and the inventory is expensive so unless you are trying to reach the desired CPA, it would not be worth it to pay that much for ad placement.
Read full review
RhythmOne
Ask advertisers what they would like to see offered from publishers that they aren't currently seeing in the space. Also, ask advertisers what their current challenges are or what they have noticed their clients pushing for recently
Read full review
Pros
AppLovin
  • ROI
  • Growth
  • Monetization
Read full review
RhythmOne
  • The industry is constantly moving towards cross-device targeting and some advertisers are lagging behind in this regard. Many do not offer the ability to target on Connected TVs, which YuMe does. This is appealing for some of our clients that are more open to testing the latest technologies.
  • YuMe's sales staff are all very knowledgeable about their products, but not too pushy when it comes to getting on the plan. They try to add value to the meetings not by just pitching their products, but by educating us on industry trends and latest technologies.
Read full review
Cons
AppLovin
  • Their support is very slow.
  • Inventory prices can be a bit high.
  • They need better anti-fraud controls.
Read full review
RhythmOne
  • It would be interesting to see YuMe to provide ad solutions that are aimed to drive in-store traffic. Many videos are often geared towards engagement or the % of video completes, but it'd be helpful to see more ad formats that are able to track in-store sales outside of having the ability to print out a coupon.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
AppLovin
No answers on this topic
RhythmOne
YuMe's service was strong. They were able to regularly provide reporting and analytics. Whenever we reached out to make optimizations, the YuMe account management team was very responsive and would provide follow ups in a timely and professional manner. YuMe was also able to provide competitive rates and deliver all the inventory that was agreed upon on the IO. Many publishers that under deliver often get cut from the plan the next time around. This was not the case for YuMe
Read full review
Usability
AppLovin
AppLovin has been a great partner for us. We have used them through our DSP and gotten great results with them. Their focus is on monetizing publishers' inventory and they could put more resources into their standalone service as an SSP to make sure DSPs can consider them strategic partners for the long term.
Read full review
RhythmOne
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
AppLovin
AppLovin's support team is their weakest point. They are not very responsive and they tend to provide solutions that do not fix the problem. It seems like they will only be proactive if you are a very big client and by doing that they are preventing the rest of the client base from increasing spend on their platform and growing their accounts
Read full review
RhythmOne
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
AppLovin
Of all of the competitors above, AppLovin is the one that is more focused on gaming and that has a better pool of users in terms of conversion rate. While PubMatic and Magnate offer better solutions for CTV, AppLovin is better than InMobi and MoPub regarding in-app formats and inventory.
Read full review
RhythmOne
YuMe is considered a leader in the video advertising space. YuMe had a very large array video ad formats that made it very flexible to run with them even though the creative and assets would change from campaign to campaign. YuMe also has a very strong portfolio of clients that have worked with them in the past. We have also requested to see the site list and there are many premium publishers that fit well with our target audience
Read full review
Return on Investment
AppLovin
  • It has had a positive impact on my business objectives
  • It has helped me grow exponentially
  • It has provided a way for me to expand my business
Read full review
RhythmOne
  • YuMe has driven a higher number of video views and video completions so that the overall campaign has strong performance metrics. YuMe also provides a great deal of reach and scale for campaigns due to its ability to offer more competitive and cost effective rates
Read full review
ScreenShots