APSIS Pro vs. Plagiarism Detector (plagiarismdetector.net)

Works well, relatively easy to use - but lacks some up-to-date and modern features as well as look and feel. The support provided is OK but not world class. It is too bad as APSIS as a company is quite good at inspiring and providing insights into trends in email marketing.

Incentivized

Plagiarismdetector.net is simple and easy to
use in mobile applications for iOS and Android devices.

Plagiarismdetector.net is a fantastic app as
it works on the site and is compatible with all versions of Windows.

Plagiarismdetector.net is effective in
detecting copied content using a formula.

Incentivized

• We have a pre-designed template and pre-build elements and thus it is quite easy to compose nice looking newsletters.
• Doing split-tests on subject, clicks etc. is quite easy and requires no tech help.
• Imporing new contacts and adding to the list is straight forward.

Incentivized

• It is a unique complement when making texts and the plagiarism test is done immediately.
• With the effectiveness that it is a page with the most effective results in search of plagiarism.
• Accurate results plus offers an analysis of any software against a duplicate copy.

Incentivized

• The user interface is not good. Too much scrolling and too many menues to navigate. Half of the pages are updated to a "new" look with the rest still being the (really) old design. This badly needs a make-over.
• There is no one-click "send reminder to those who did not open". To send reminders, it is nescessary to build a filter a do a new send using the filter. Such a simple and often repeated task should be automated.
• It is not possible to add a "Why did you leave us?"-page for opt-outs... Really misses this.
• The statistics are too limited and to difficult to use - mostly due to the UI design as described above.

Incentivized

• In principle, it provides a limit of 2,000 characters per analysis and only searches for matches using Bing technology, but by registering on the web for free, the character limitation disappears and the possibilities of its search engine are expanded

Incentivized

MailChimp offers more flexibilty but also seems a bit more complicated to use. We did not use it long enough to really get an idea of the positive and negative.

Incentivized

They really have a lot of similarities, they all help you detect plagiarism and correct grammar. Grammarly helps you create authentic texts without grammatical errors, and Dupli checker helps you review texts to avoid all repeated texts or copied/pasted texts from another internet source, which helps you avoid plagiarism. Copyleaks, just like Dupli Checker and Plagiarism Detector, helps you detect plagiarism in your projects, texts, and URLs. My preference for Plagiarism Detector is that I can check the grammar, check that the texts are authentic, and convert all files from PDF to Word.

Incentivized

• We are still trying to figure out how to use this medium for sales. We have had some success with Black Monday sales, but in general we do not have much response to our emails.
• We have increases our visibility with our customers by making sure to land in their mailbox regulary with nice looking messages.

Incentivized

• The main page is clumsy, and there are too many popups.
• There are presently no features or aspects of this program that I hate.

Incentivized