Attivo BOTsink vs. Zscaler Deception

It is best suited when deployed at perimeter and integrated with SIEM and SOAR solution. It will be able to replicate assets and display realistic configurations making difficult for hackers. We were able to avoid or block 40% of attacks targetted to our critical servers and could easily identify threat actors.

Incentivized

Zscaler Deception Technology is well suited for companies that want to provide private access to their internal apps without using a VPN. Zscaler integrates zero trust into their honey tools that is good for detecting lateral movement. With Zscaler you allow only your employees to be able to access internal apps so detecting a bad actor is much easier.

Incentivized

• Identifies devices
• Provides threat details in real time
• Provides network topology with potential threat paths

Incentivized

• Improve risk and compliance program.
• Agent deployment is easy.
• Improve decision making.

Incentivized

• More fine tuning of threat detection capabilities needed
• Users should be able to modify AIML configuration
• Improving the display dashboard

Incentivized

• Cannot use internal DNS
• Much tuning needed
• Access typically limited to internal apps

Incentivized

Attivo BoTsink was selected based on cost price and wide coverage of detection capabilities. Our decision was primarily based on reducing efforts to identify and mitigation of attacks. The ease of deployment was additional factor in decision making. As compared to Zscaler Deception and SentinelOne Singularity I found Attivo BoTsink detects more threats

Incentivized

Incentivized

• Advanced reporting has saved from hiring additional personnel to monitor security threats
• Real time identification of threats saves response time from actual breach
• Third-party needed to be leveraged to help configure Attivo BOTsink

Incentivized

• Improved threat detection.
• Lesser false positive alerts.

Incentivized