IFS Assyst vs. ServiceNow IT Asset Management

I would suggest that in this product class, you get what you pay for. Although it is was sold as SAAS with a nearly 'plug and play' implementation, at least one full time highly trained admin is needed for ongoing support. I would advise a team implementation strategy.

Incentivized

As I have used it as a ticketing tool, so it has an ability to integrate very well with other softwares to help make co ordination in your work much easier. Whenever, I used to get a scenario from end user regarding an issue via chat, the service now window would pop up immediately as it was integrated.

Incentivized

• IT Asset Management and IT Service Management in one product
• ITIL framework
• Highly customisable service catalogue and processes
• Mature mobility product

• Single place portal for employees and IT for assets assigned
• Track the requests raised by employees and manage the historical record for reference

Incentivized

• Service requests, incident, problem, and change management
• Knowledge mgmt is not-existent - the product uses a WIKI for it's own knowledge base.
• Axios help desk does is not knowledgable and does not follow up on reported incidents
• Training is incomplete - no real resources available except billable by the hour.

Incentivized

• One quick thing is integration to reporting platforms like MS Power BI
• License levels because a normal user with an ITIL license cannot schedule reports..need another license there
• Easy way to track SLA for incident Management

Incentivized

At this point, we are stuck with it. We can't afford a change at this point.

Incentivized

Axios assyst outperforms JIRA in every aspect, JIRA is a good job system but when it comes to complex processes and configuration management then JIRA is simply not the right system.

We have used Zendesk in past and are able to achieve many functionalities. This tool was also providing almost the same capability but ServiceNow has some more features which [are] more user friendly and easy to use. The knowledge base article feature is very useful and that was not easy to manage with Zendesk. Change management feature was not available with Zendesk too.

Incentivized

• Replacement of 3 systems with Axios assyst
• Integration with other enterprise systems

• Positive: manage ticket in a short time.
• Positive: relationship with customer.
• Negative: use two tools in order to manage internally by the team.

Incentivized