Built for Teams vs. Criterion HCM
Built for Teams vs. Criterion HCM
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Built for Teams | N/A | Built for Teams is an HRIS solution that is designed for small and mid-sized businesses. The vendor’s value proposition is that their employee self-service capabilities help to offload work from valuable HR managers while giving employees direct access to important information. Additionally, the vendor says customers select their solution due to the intuitive user interface and their excellent customer service. | N/A | |
Criterion HCM | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Built for Teams | Criterion HCM | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Built for Teams | Criterion HCM | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
| |
Top Cons |
|
|
Built for Teams | Criterion HCM | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Human Resource Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Payroll Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Leave and Attendance Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Employee Self Service |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
HR Reporting |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Onboarding |
|
Built for Teams | Criterion HCM | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | Dayforce Powerpay Score 9.3 out of 10 | Dayforce Powerpay Score 9.3 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | Paypro Workforce Management Score 9.7 out of 10 | Paypro Workforce Management Score 9.7 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Infor Human Resources Score 7.1 out of 10 | Infor Human Resources Score 7.1 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Built for Teams | Criterion HCM | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 (7 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
Usability | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 1.0 (1 ratings) |
Built for Teams | Criterion HCM | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Objective Inc. | Criterion |
Pros | Objective Inc. | Criterion |
Cons | Objective Inc. | Criterion |
Likelihood to Renew | Objective Inc. No answers on this topic | Criterion |
Usability | Objective Inc. No answers on this topic | Criterion |
Support Rating | Objective Inc. No answers on this topic | Criterion |
Implementation Rating | Objective Inc. No answers on this topic | Criterion |
Alternatives Considered | Objective Inc. | Criterion |
Return on Investment | Objective Inc. | Criterion |
ScreenShots | Built for Teams Screenshots |