BullseyeEngagement vs. PeopleFluent

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BullseyeEngagement
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Treating people as a company’s most important asset is not just the right thing to do, it’s also key to business success. BullseyeEngagement fuels a dynamic employee experience with talent development, employee engagement, and continuous performance management solutions. Their strategic planning tools help future-proof businesses so users can make human capital strategy a competitive advantage. They aim to help businesses operate at its highest potential—with employees engaged in their…N/A
PeopleFluent
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.N/A
Pricing
BullseyeEngagementPeopleFluent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BullseyeEngagementPeopleFluent
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsBullseye’s solution suite is modular, so you can generally subscribe only to the solutions that you want to use immediately and upgrade anytime.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BullseyeEngagementPeopleFluent
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
BullseyeEngagementPeopleFluent
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
BullseyeEngagement
8.8
1 Ratings
19% above category average
PeopleFluent
8.2
11 Ratings
12% above category average
Corporate goal setting8.01 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting9.01 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Individual goal setting7.01 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility10.01 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Performance tracking10.01 Ratings7.09 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
BullseyeEngagement
9.3
1 Ratings
30% above category average
PeopleFluent
6.5
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Performance plans9.01 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Plan weighting7.01 Ratings4.06 Ratings
Manager note taking8.01 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Performance improvement plans10.01 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Review status tracking10.01 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Review reminders10.01 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Workflow restrictions10.01 Ratings5.06 Ratings
Multiple review frequency10.01 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Reporting10.01 Ratings7.08 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
BullseyeEngagement
9.0
1 Ratings
23% above category average
PeopleFluent
6.3
8 Ratings
13% below category average
Create succession plans/pools8.01 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Candidate ranking9.01 Ratings6.05 Ratings
Candidate search10.01 Ratings6.08 Ratings
Candidate development9.01 Ratings6.06 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
BullseyeEngagement
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.0
11 Ratings
9% above category average
New hire portal00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Manager tracking tools00 Ratings9.011 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
BullseyeEngagement
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
9.5
8 Ratings
26% above category average
Job Requisition Management00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Company Website Posting00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Publish to Social Media00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Customized Application Form00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Resume Management00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention00 Ratings6.05 Ratings
Candidate Search00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
Applicant Tracking00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Collaboration00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Email Templates00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
User Permissions00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
BullseyeEngagement
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
5.8
2 Ratings
20% below category average
Course catalog or library00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Player/Portal00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Learning content00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Mobile friendly00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Assignments00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Compliance management00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Learning administration00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Social learning00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BullseyeEngagementPeopleFluent
Small Businesses
Paycor
Paycor
Score 7.3 out of 10
Paycor
Paycor
Score 7.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.4 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.4 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BullseyeEngagementPeopleFluent
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.8
(31 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(13 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(4 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BullseyeEngagementPeopleFluent
Likelihood to Recommend
BullseyeEngagement
The specific scenarios where it was well suited was scaling out. We were able to set up the system for our initial pilot and scale out in a short period of time. The system is just as dependable and workable with a small numbers of participants as it is with larger and larger sets. Even as it grew out it still reflected a personal touch to the users which is very important for software like this. It is not that it is inappropriate but would be challenging in a severely fragmented organization. That is scenario where there are two essential functions going on with the organization which are acting as separate companies - but this is a note concerning a specific experience with a company in India where they were operating in two distinctly different states with totally different expectations and behaviors.
Read full review
PeopleFluent
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
Read full review
Pros
BullseyeEngagement
  • Automating Surveys
  • Communicating with the entire group of workers at the client facilities
  • Gathering together information for Talent Matching
Read full review
PeopleFluent
  • It was very easy to go through resumes, choose the people you wanted to interview and set up the interviews.
  • It is great at keeping track of people that have come through hiring process in the past so you do not waste time on those that have already been declined or are sent in by multiple vendors.
  • The handling of time sheets and expense reports is very easy to manage.
Read full review
Cons
BullseyeEngagement
  • Succession planning could use a little work but really the shortfalls had to do with client idiosyncrasies
  • Ethics lifeline was a little hard to reign in, the executives at our client were very fussy for all the wrong reasons - no pun intended
  • Compensation Planning was also hard to work with but once again it was internal problems at the client that caused these slowdowns
Read full review
PeopleFluent
  • The interface is a little confusing. I'm not sure if it's something that can be fixed in implementations, or if it's inherent to PeopleFluent, but there are almost too many tabs asking for too much information. A lot of it can be repetitive as well.
  • Changing your password/resetting your password seems to be nightmarish. It requires an organization ID as well as security questions, and forces you to reset your password far too often. I really dislike that feature.
  • Honestly, PeopleFluent itself looks pretty outdated. I feel as though the entire application really needs a facelift to be more current.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
BullseyeEngagement
They are great to work with. It would be enough that the software does and behaves in the way it is explained and marketed. It is wonderful to see it exceed these expectations. It is a pleasure to work with as are the representatives from the company. They are helpful, concerned and expert in their duties.
Read full review
PeopleFluent
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
Read full review
Usability
BullseyeEngagement
No answers on this topic
PeopleFluent
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
Read full review
Support Rating
BullseyeEngagement
No answers on this topic
PeopleFluent
I would rate this ATS system a 9 as there's some room for improvement as mentioned prior. I really love the design and its functionality buttons and the way I can integrate it with other systems. I would really love to see a more detailed reporting metrics long with super candidate filters when searching profiles.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
BullseyeEngagement
BullseyeEngagement towers over their competitors. We selected them as a result of careful research for our internal uses. We brought them along to our clients because of our personal experience. The staff at BullseyeEngagement are themselves engaged and active. They were forthcoming, cooperative and helpful. Their product is polished, well made, dependable and logical and easy to operate. Even though it is easy to work with it provides the complex sort of work necessary when carefully setting up a fair system of evaluation and employee development.
Read full review
PeopleFluent
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their liking. Not to mention it's a very popular tool that i have had the pleasure of working in twice now with two different organizations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
BullseyeEngagement
  • The return on investment for us focused on the flexibility of the product
  • When using the software directly and when adapting it for our clients the time frame for development and installation and use was very short
  • The quality of the outputs and the ease with which the system was put in place was extraordinary and saved us money even during the replacement period as it replaced the outdated system in place at our client
Read full review
PeopleFluent
  • I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
  • I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.
Read full review
ScreenShots

BullseyeEngagement Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

PeopleFluent Screenshots

Screenshot of PeopleFluent Talent Management DashboardScreenshot of Recruiting DashboardScreenshot of Compensation DashboardScreenshot of Performance DashboardScreenshot of Analytics Dashboard