Carbonite Availability vs. HPE Cloud Volumes

I believe it would work well with continuous replication in a DR scenario with no time limits and having the ability to fail back is a bonus, but in a one off move the decision to restrict the time it can sync for has proven to be an issue for us.

Incentivized

In our organization, we are using HPE Cloud Volumes for backups storage. HPE Cloud Volumes has given the flexibility of maximum availability and scalability. Now adding space is not a cumbersome process and it can be easily managed by HPE Cloud Volumes as per our need. In another scenario, we have used HPE Cloud Volumes for temporary storing the data for Datacenter move activity. On the downside, I think HPE Cloud Volumes solution is not suitable for temporary need as its more of a long term solution.

Incentivized

• A product is worthless in my opinion if you don't have a great support team to work with. I've had issues with replication jobs that were resolved quickly and easily by the support team.
• DR - Doubletake is the only tool that I'm aware of that can handle DR replication of both physical and virtual environments. There sre others, but they use a snapshot technology, where doubletake has continuous replication of data.
• Move - we have moved physical and virtual environments from around the world without ever having to leave the office. One of the companies we migrated started off with their equipment in Switzerland, and after the servers were in a fully protected state in the US, that failover to the new location took 45 min.

Incentivized

• It Really simplifying our day to day operations for engineers to maintain the backup needs, aligning our infra to actual use
• You can leverage efficient,and, we have kind of mixed needs for cloud and on-premises storage, It does exceptionally well
• It really provides a Ransomware Protection and long-term retention.
• It delivers simple diaster recovery and also its statisfy our backup needs from the edge to cloud for our genesys applications.

Incentivized

• More verbose error messages. So we can fix problems with more ease
• More bandwidth settings for throttling.
• Ability to restart services on servers from the double take console

Incentivized

• Not suitable for small scale enterprises
• Initial setup is bit difficult
• Pricing can be more flexible which can suits different customer of different needs.

Incentivized

the product UI is user friendly and product is straightforward to use.

Incentivized

Once through to support it is very good and they have assisted us through a number of issues. I don't always think that they provide a solution, more a workaround, but in a move situation where each copy is moving once, that isn't an issue. I'd be more concerned if we were using it to manage a DR scenario.

Incentivized

It is better for critical apps than Veeam due to the lower RPO. Veeam is favoured by some customers due to it's attractive price point. Zerto is a very strong product and is innovating continuously. I don't see so much of this from DoubleTake.

Incentivized

HPE Cloud Volumes Backup unlocks agility and powers innovation. It really eliminate the complexity of day-to-day hassles. For our On-premises and Muticloud backup needs Based on our evaluavtion , we had to come to this decision to go for HPE

Incentivized

• It has allowed us through DR testing to meet contractual requirements of our major accounts..
• It gives us peace of mind that in the event of a major issue we can perform our daily business with a relative success rate.

Incentivized

• Backups on HPE Cloud Volumes has significantly reduced the cost of on premise handling of backups
• It provided storage for datacenter move which reduced the migration time
• Hosting smaller application in HPE Cloud Volumes has helped in saving operating cost.

Incentivized