Conceptboard is a collaboration software built for teams of any size. Its primary features are project management, team whiteboards, integration into business workflows, and real-time collaboration.
Conceptboard has a very simple interface design. and stands out with a successful UX/UI design. can offer a rapid adaptation process for volatile employees and customers. While it has many features compared to its competitors, its interface is not complicated. However, some of …
Verified User
Executive
Chose Conceptboard
Can be tricky sometimes and misses features like voting items. Allows the use of templates and adding sticky notes and writings with a timer.it takes time to understand which user roles have which views and permissions. Access for "guests" needs a lot of explanation. Nothing …
In our experience we cannot compare this product with another since this tool is the first of its kind that we have used, but the good thing is that we could not adapt it to
We have selected Conceptboard because it was easy to use and easy to adopt by every team member. Also, the pricing model is really very good and adaptable by almost every organization. Secondly, it is a web-based application and it allows us to access it from anywhere using any …
I selected conceptboard due to the availability of various features like audio / visual connect, design thinking, brainstorm, accessibility of the changemaker history.
Microsoft Teams doesn't offer nearly the customizing and tools that Conceptboard can offer teams. Being able to visualize your idea and see its potential of it in person is unmatched. It has a large database and offers a great user experience. This is the best team …
Conceptboard does not lag as compared to its other competitors. It is fast and easy to use and is very much considerable from the pricing point of view as well because of low cost monthly plans. It is simple and right on point with the latest updated tools which is what makes …
Microsoft has their own version of it but it does not seem as intricate or in-depth. The ease of access and user friendliness on Conceptboard is better in my opinion.
You can annotate and draw on zoom but it's only for live scenarios, even if you review the presentation after, …
The most similar software to Conceptboard I have used is Google Drive in that users can actively collaborate on documents in real-time and create graphics in an online collaborative setting. However, Conceptboard goes above and beyond by offering exceptional teaming tools such …
Initially, we selected Conceptboard due to its quick TAT with respect to integration and implementation. Also, it is a quite cheaper option as compared to its direct competitors. The main reason to select Conceptboard was - 1. The infinite canvas really helped with longer …
I like ConceptBoard better than Miro. Miro also offers a similar virtual "whiteboard" but Conceptboard has a better UX and is easier (and more fun) to use.
I've used Figma extensively, and still do, for UX planning and design but have moved away from them for brainstorming. Figma…
Conceptboard provides an easy whiteboard with multi-functions, that aren't lagging while more people are working on it and that is easy to self-explain, while I faced lagging while using Miro. Conceptboard is just easy compatible in any business situation (in-office, Zoom …
Conceptboard's user interface is a lot more intuitive, flexible, and easy to use. Real-time monitoring down to cursor movements is also something that Conceptboard has an edge on, as well as allowing for file attachments to which you can annotate or comment directly on the …
We preferred Conceptboard as it was easier to use and quicker to get familiar with. Since it was easier to get accustomed to, our team members were able to concentrate on the task of idea creation and sharing concepts and perspectives. There was a greater focus and less …
Miro is a superior product with more capabilities and better suited for advanced users. We selected Conceptboard as a short-term solution that was low-cost compared to Miro but allowed users to create boards. Once users are versed in Conceptboard, they are better off using Miro …
Well suited - 1. Whiteboarding, brainstorming, designing, workshops, etc. 2. Templates - Pretty good repository of ready-to-use templates esp for project management, agile, etc. Less appropriate - 1. Anything that requires integration with existing enterprising software - limitations like no integration with Jira, Asana, etc. 2. Embedding anything related to images, videos, etc. The embed is not very smooth, it lags, and sometimes straight out doesn't work 3. Image search - Many competitors provide this feature and hence Conceptboard lacks here
Great user interface that's very intuitive and easy to use. This is an important aspect of collaboration, brainstorming sessions often involve a lot of people coming from different functions who may not be too familiar with these tools
Allows users to see real-time changes and actions done by others from sticky notes/comments down to their cursor movements
Lets users add/attach files and annotate/comment on each directly on the board which skips the hassle of having to look at files using different programs/platforms and referencing on the board
Miro is a superior product with more capabilities and better suited for advanced users. We selected Conceptboard as a short-term solution that was low-cost compared to Miro but allowed users to create boards. Once users are versed in Conceptboard, they are better off using Miro which has more integration, better capabilities, and is overall a more complete product.
I can say that this tool is unique since its impact on our work team has been one of the best we have ever had since it allows us to exchange ideas in one place through boards, which is more fun with the video call function