3 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 6 out of 100
Top Rated
10 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.1 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Zip Intake-to-Procure is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

5.0

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

50%
1 Rating
9.1

Zip Intake-to-Procure

91%
10 Ratings

Likelihood to Renew

5.0

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

50%
1 Rating

Zip Intake-to-Procure

N/A
0 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

Corcentric

It is well suited for applications which has centralized data system. For desperate databases, big performance hit could be unavoidable.Web based Sales solutions which could be easily unplugged from big infrastructure and to be used in field with no need of network connectivity or front office availability would be ideal candidates for CPQ
Read full review

Zip

Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility.
Read full review

Pros

Corcentric

  • Pricing engine is a big plus in CPQ.
  • The flex modeling supported in CPQ increases the model efficiency by eliminating unwanted options
  • Integrating external tools into selectica by exporting out xmls make it easier
Read full review

Zip

  • Clear visibility into the PR workflow for all requesters and approvers
  • Ability to modify/tweak workflows based on particular requests or as our organization evolves without needing technical support from Zip Intake-to-Procure
  • Easy integrations into other tools already used by the organization including NetSuite, Slack, Asana and DocuSign
  • Vendor level records for tracking privacy and security data as well as vendor contacts
Read full review

Cons

Corcentric

  • Model builder's sluggishness.
Read full review

Zip

  • Zip [Intake-to-Procure] could use better commenting capabilities, more flexibility in its dashboard, and could integrate more broadly into our GRC systems.
Read full review

Pricing Details

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica)

Starting Price

Editions & Modules

Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform (Determine / Selectica) editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Zip Intake-to-Procure

    Starting Price

    $0

    Editions & Modules

    Zip Intake-to-Procure editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Likelihood to Renew

      Corcentric

      Unless CPQ is available on cloud or available as platform as service, I am less likely to consider it again. The initial cost involved is high and also the time required for that.
      Read full review

      Zip

      No answers on this topic

      Alternatives Considered

      Corcentric

      I used Saleslogix.
      Read full review

      Zip

      Truth be told, we haven’t seen any other similar products. The alternative was manually tracking in Google Sheets, ticketing systems, and in NetSuite. Coupa was probably the closest in terms of what we were looking for but they were not willing to fit it to our needs like Zip was able to.
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      Corcentric

      • yes, faster lead conversion as Field sales team rely less on main office
      • reduced sales cycle.
      • Reduced Sales overheads, deal closure can happen at client location.
      Read full review

      Zip

      • Visibility in to the overall procurement process
      • Business speed for approvals and information sharing with adjacent stakeholders and their preferred systems
      • Business speed and happy requesters
      Read full review

      Screenshots

      Add comparison