Firecracker vs. Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Firecracker
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Firecracker is an open source virtualization technology that is purpose-built for creating and managing secure, multi-tenant container and function-based services. Firecracker enables users to deploy workloads in lightweight virtual machines, called microVMs that may provide security and workload isolation over traditional VMs, while enabling the speed and resource efficiency of containers. Firecracker was developed at Amazon Web Services with the goal of improving services like AWS Lambda…N/A
KVM
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) is a virtualization solution developed by small Israeli software company Qumranet and supported by Red Hat since that company's acquisition in 2008.N/A
Pricing
FirecrackerKernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FirecrackerKVM
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FirecrackerKernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)
Features
FirecrackerKernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)
Server Virtualization
Comparison of Server Virtualization features of Product A and Product B
Firecracker
6.4
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)
9.2
6 Ratings
14% above category average
Virtual machine automated provisioning6.01 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Management console8.01 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Live virtual machine backup6.01 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Live virtual machine migration7.01 Ratings10.05 Ratings
Hypervisor-level security5.01 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FirecrackerKernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)
Small Businesses
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.4 out of 10
DigitalOcean Droplets
DigitalOcean Droplets
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
VMware vSOM (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FirecrackerKernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)
Likelihood to Recommend
4.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(6 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
FirecrackerKernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM)
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
While deploying workloads in lightweight microVMs presents a couple of perks, Firecracker may not be the best software to handle this. Startup times are slow and scalability is quite limited because of the jailer and virtualization barriers. We have had security breaches on isolated EC2 instances while using Firecracker. It however has a silver lining by improving how serverless functions in container ecosystems are run with their VMMs.
Read full review
Red Hat
KVM is the best solution in the case you need to test and turn up any virtual environment with limited vCPU/RAM resources. The obvious area of its use is a network environment when we want to avoid being tied to one type of hardware/vendor and being able to swap from one instance to another with no downtimes. The use of a vSwitch (that supports VLAN tagging) is a significant bonus for network engineers that some other hypervisors do not provide.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • It makes it easy to secure virtual machines as they are segmented into microvms with a minimal attack surface area
Read full review
Red Hat
  • KVM is really good at providing fast and reliable virtualization for Linux guests
  • Since KVM is a kernel module, every VM is a Linux process which can be managed by Linux system tools
  • KVM integrates very well with the management framework libvirt, which is why KVM can be integrated in automation tools as well
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • Excludes devices unnecessarily
  • Has a slow startup time the basis being to improve security which is quite irrelevant.
  • It has limited functionalities on monitoring VMs despite being an open source.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • KVM itself doesn't ship with a management interface
  • KVM itself is a bit complicated to handle
  • KVM needs Qemu to virtualize Windows guests
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
It does the job and stays out of the way. The specifics of usability relies on the implementation, but with things like Icarus and libvirt, things are standardizing nicely.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Red Hat
It is a very reliable solution that can be used for x86 architecture virtualization with low overhead. It is a free and open source software. Easy to use withOpenStack.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Low memory overhead on each microVM
  • We can run workloads from different customers on the same machine.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Fast provisioning of new servers.
  • Huge drop of the cost of servers compared to bare metal.
  • Easy upgrades of resources, sometimes now even requiring a server restart.
Read full review
ScreenShots