TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    GNU Make

    Score7.7 out of 10
    N/AGNU Make is an open source and free build automation tool.N/A

    Travis CI

    Score7.3 out of 10
    N/ATravis CI is an open source continuous integration platform, that enables users to run and test simultaneously on different environments, and automatically catch code failures and bugs.

    $69

    per month 1 concurrent job

    Pricing
    GNU MakeTravis CI
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    1 Concurrent Job Plan
    $69
    per month
    Bootstrap
    $69
    per month 1 concurrent job
    2 Concurrent Jobs Plan
    $129
    per month
    Startup
    $129
    per month 2 concurrent jobs
    5 Concurrent Jobs Plan
    $249
    per month
    Small Business
    $249
    per month 5 concurrent jobs
    Premium
    $489
    per month 10 concurrent jobs
    Platinum
    $794+
    per month starting at 15 concurrent jobs
    Free Plan
    Free
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GNU MakeTravis CI
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    GNU MakeTravis CI
    Small Businesses
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Apache Maven
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    Gradle Build Tool (Open Source)
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    GNU MakeTravis CI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.1
    (2 ratings)
    6.0
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.1
    (2 ratings)
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    GNU MakeTravis CI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Open Source
    GNU Make is a great tool for simple builds where language-specific options are not available, or to provide shortcuts for common commands (e.g., "make build" as shorthand for "go build ..." with a bunch of flags). However, it is complementary to other build systems. It does not replace them, which is perhaps one of its greatest strengths as well (works with existing ecosystem instead of trying to do everything). GMU Make it simple to get started with, and the philosophy of understanding how sources map to outputs, as well as the dependency graph, are beneficial.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Idera, Inc.
    TravisCI is suited for workflows involving typical software development but unfortunately I think the software needs more improvement to be up to date with current development systems and TravisCI hasn't been improving much in that space in terms of integrations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Open Source
    • Performance and accuracy of cross-module dependencies.
    • Simple to write and easy to understand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Idera, Inc.
    • It is very simple to configure a range of environment versions and settings in a simple YAML file.
    • It integrates very well with Github, Bitbucket, or a private Git repo.
    • The Travis CI portal beautifully shows you your history and console logs. Everything is presented in a very clear and intuitive interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Open Source
    • No dependency management tools (but there are no cross-platform tools of this type anyway)
    • Tedious to do cross-compilation (Debug & Release builds, 32- and 64-bit builds, x86/ARM builds)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Idera, Inc.
    • I think they could have a cheaper personal plan. I'd love to use Travis on personal projects, but I don't want to publish them nor I can pay $69 a month for personal projects that I don't want to be open source.
    • There is no interface for configuring repos on Travis CI, you have to do it via a file in the repo. This make configuration very flexible, but also makes it harder for simpler projects and for small tweaks in the configuration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Open Source
    No answers on this topic
    Idera, Inc.
    TravisCI hasn't had much changes made to its software and has thus fallen behind compared to many other CI/CD applications out there. I can only give it a 5 because it does what it is supposed to do but lacks product innovation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Open Source
    In general, it is fair to say the support is sufficient although we do not deal with support directly. There are a lot of forum people chiming in with suggestions or recommendations of particular usage or issues we run into. Since it is open software, patch and fixes will be available from time to time. A lot of information is available in the web now for knowing GNU Make from learning, example, teaching, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Idera, Inc.
    After the private equity firm had bought this company the innovation and support has really gone downhill a lot. I am not a fan that they have gutted the software trying to make money from it and put innovation and product development second.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Open Source
    I'm a full-stack developer that has used various build tools, including Maven, Gradle, and NPM/yarn. For our C projects, I also investigated CMake and Ninja, but they seemed more difficult to learn and more tedious to work with. GNU Make is a single binary that can be easily downloaded, even for Windows under MingW32, is straightforward to learn, and works pretty well despite its age.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Idera, Inc.
    Jenkins is much more complicated to configure and start using. Although, one you have done that, it's extremely powerful and full of features. Maybe many more than Travis CI. As per TeamCity, I would never go back to using it. It's also complicated to configure but it is not worth the trouble. Codeship supports integration with GitHub, GitLab and BitBucket. I've only used it briefly, but it seems to be a nice tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Open Source
    • Streamline the build based on a lot of existing component being done, reusable.
    • Commonly understandable, therefore, rampup effort is small.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Idera, Inc.
    • It's improved my ability to deliver working code, increasing my development velocity.
    • It increases confidence that your own work (and those of external contributors) does not have any obvious bugs, provided you have sufficient test coverage.
    • It helps to ensure consistent standards across a team (you can integrate process elements like "go lint" and other style checks as part of your build).
    • It's zero-cost for public/open source projects, so the only investment is a few minutes setting up a build configuration file (hence the return is very high).
    • The .travis.yml file is a great way for onboarding new developers, since it shows how to bootstrap a build environment and run a build "from scratch".
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots