Graylog, headquartered in Houston, offers their eponymous platform for centralized log management that helps users find meaning in data faster so as to take action immediately. Graylog is available via Enterprise and Cloud plans, but also has a Small Business Plan, and an Open (free) plan with limited features.
N/A
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Splunk is software for searching, monitoring, and analyzing machine-generated big data, via a web-style interface. It captures, indexes and correlates real-time data in a searchable repository from which it can generate graphs, reports, alerts, dashboards and visualizations.
Blackfire and Sentry both offer more resources, not only monitoring logs but also performance and real time erros - on those areas they are more complete and generalistic tools. Graylog, however, is better on log saving, search and analysis alone, because of its flexible and …
Graylog has the simplest deployment, and it is ready to work in a few clicks. Although we also use Grafana and Zabbix in our environment, the role of processing log data is better suited to Graylog. In our case, we use Graylog to process and analyze web application logs, such …
Azure Monitor is not exactly what I mean, but I couldn't find Azure Application Insights. Anyway, for a large organization, Azure makes more sense than using Graylog because a lot of logging will already be inside Azure. And you don't want to have two "central" logging …
We use the free edition, because it is free and open source. We evaluated numerous other products, but we decided to go down the Graylog track because of initial costs. While the competition (Splunk, AlienVault, etc.) are very good products and come highly recommended, it …
In terms of log aggregation, the free product fully stacks up with the competitors listed. Full control over the data ingests for flexible configuration. Graylog even better on that front than Alienvault USM because you cannot configure the variable mapping. We haven't used …
Graylog does what other similar products that cost more do, but the more expansive one typically has more features or are multiple products wrapped in one. We went with Graylog because it does everything we need it too, and the price was less than other and fit into our budget. …
We previously used Syslog(-ng) and considered moving to the Logstash with Kibana as part of the standard ELK stack as we are consumers of ELK in other scenarios, but we determined that maintaining a distributed Graylog system was going to require less work overtime for our main …
Graylog provides some great functionality for free. There are some more premium products that would handle more logs and would be a little easier to configure.
Splunk could sort a much better log correlation than it competitors. dynatrace have better dashboards, but its harder to setup and in our case, way too expensive. with Splunk, no one regrets migrating from Qradar. it looks like different generations tools. the correlation is …
Splunk Enterprise has been a well-established solution for many clients for a long time and is a major player in the market. Its track record and performance make it the best choice. Furthermore, its ease of use for developing, using, and managing data makes it the best among …
Splunk Enterprise stands out compared to other solutions due to its broad compatibility and flexibility. It integrates easily with a wide range of infrastructure, network, security, and application products, thanks to its support for multiple data formats and its extensive …
Splunk is the undisputed leader in Security Information and Event Management. Splunk Enterprise Security allows for massive, complex correlation of data across disparate sources. It can be deployed entirely on-premise or in a private cloud, giving total "data sovereignty." …
Splunk Enterprise stacks similarly to IBM's qradar and outperforms both Palo Alto's Panorama and Cisco's Secure Firewall Management Center in regards to storing large amounts of logs and the ability for quick searches. Splunk Enterprise handles queries of data effectively and …
Splunk Enterprise is a very seasoned software , while other comparable software keep on adding new features and keep evolving, Splunk Enterprise has reached a state where new user onboarded doesnt have to request any basic feature or develop modules to simple tasks. Log parsing …
Splunk does a good job at log aggregation and compatibility however, integrations with other products is been a challenge. Especially the pricing can be more competitive to spice up the market and orgs looking to explore AI based logging over traditional practices.
Able to show more than Log data in Splunk views, we tested several plug-ins during a small pilot, and we were able to bring O/S (Win/Unix/Linux) & APM data metrics into the same views as Logged data. I've seen others use it to visualize a wider range of data types, too...better …
While both are market-leading SIEM platforms, they cater to different environments and organization priorities. The choice often comes down to a company's existing infrastructure, integration needs, and long-term security strategy. Deployment and architecture - Splunk offeres …
Splunk features of storing data and ingestion of logs , indexing of data , data analytics make is superior to other tools. Definately there is more improvement requirement in terms of visualisation of data but one stop for all features make splunk better than various other …
Splunk Enterprise was already chosen by our organization to be used across teams. However, the reasoning I know behind is the ability to share events/messages across different message brokers and making onboarding easier to legacy teams by just simple configuration.
Splunk was better in terms of analyzing unstructured data. Also Splunk has had a very good and strong community and is also has a more tried and tested performance. I personally found the dash boarding capability of Splunk better than datadog.
Omnibus was a Linux based tool. Not very easy to sue. End user needs to know Linux commands. Splunk Enterprise is more flexible and ease to use. Splunk Enterprise can generate reports, graphs, data visualization, data validation and much more. Use friendly query language and …
A lot of products have natively inside their own dashboards and or their own logging repositories. And each one is difficult to learn or they're too complex or they're not verbose in the sense that they're not easy to mine the data that you're looking for. So that could be …
Elastic and it's a little bit more cumbersome and a little bit more time consuming. Using Splunk is much easier flow and quicker to utilize to get to the root of a problem.
Cost was major factor which made us choose Splunk Enterprisek. Splunk Enterprise is versatile tool which further helped us to make our decision. Apart from that Managment wish to use something robust hence Splunk Enterprise became there first choice.
Splunk Enterprise is honestly the first tool we used and we cant realistically switch. We have not done any in depth studies or comparisons. We know there are alternatives and we would probably switch if one of them was much more economically viable, but right now we are happy …
If you already have a basic understanding of Elasticsearch and/or MongoDB, Graylog will be a great fit when it comes to log aggregation. It will be a decent option even if you don't have any experience but have the time and willingness to roll up your sleeves that learning those tools will require. Graylog supports plugins to extend functionality for things like SNMP traps, telemetry collection, and solar flares. As is the case with most software with plugins, if the core functionality for which you are looking (i.e. not logging) is based on a plugin, Graylog probably isn't for you. The majority of the plugins in the marketplace are developed by third-parties looking to solve their specific use case so bug fixes and new features are not a given.
I'm liking the newer products, and I'm looking forward to how they integrate with the overall product when they come together. Just log in and be able to query a large number of systems for similar issues or a unique one. That is a great fit for Splunk Enterprise, looking for a simple case or a simple String or something of that nature across multiple machines. It's a great fit for that to identify issues or particular software, whatever your scenario is, String, to find it across any particular server or group of servers, so that you can update or do a deployment or whatever it is you're looking to do.
We are using Splunk extensively in our projects and we have recently upgraded to Splunk version 6.0 which is quite efficient and giving expected results. We keep track of updates and new features Splunk introduces periodically and try to introduce those features in our day to day activities for improvement in our reporting system and other tasks.
Graylog is more on the technical side of user interface, with a steep learning curve that can be challenging for non-tech people. Once its logic is understood, however, its great to use and people have no issues to find the information they need. It's configuration is also not that easy, however this we consider impossible to avoid in spite of the type of service it does
Splunk usability could be a little more friendly on correlations and log analysis. not for end users, but for the tech team, sometimes is hard to find good professionals to set up integrations and new dashboards when needed. For the high-level management, it can be overwhelming to read Splunk dashboards.
Community support does not give simple straightforward answers; simply search up Graylog Issues and look at some of the responses on the forums. The documentation is your only hope if you are on the free version, as you can NOT purchase only support. The few times I have worked with Graylog Enterprise support they were great though.
Splunk maintains a well resourced support system that has been consistent since we purchased the product. They help out in a timely manner and provide expert level information as needed. We typically open cases online and communicate when possible via e-mail and are able to resolve most issues with that method.
The online course was simple clear and described the main capabilities of the solution. There is also an initial module that can be done for free so anyone can familiarize themselves with the functionality of this solution. On the other hand, however, there could be more free online courses. Maybe even with a certificate, this would broaden the group of people who are familiar with the platform while increasing familiarity with the solution itself.
Azure Monitor is not exactly what I mean, but I couldn't find Azure Application Insights. Anyway, for a large organization, Azure makes more sense than using Graylog because a lot of logging will already be inside Azure. And you don't want to have two "central" logging locations. But Azure is chaos and highly "not intuitive." So for small and mid-size organizations, Graylog is still the better option.
A lot of products have natively inside their own dashboards and or their own logging repositories. And each one is difficult to learn or they're too complex or they're not verbose in the sense that they're not easy to mine the data that you're looking for. So that could be anything from the native logging that you find in other Cisco products. It's easier to use Splunk to draw the data that you're looking for as opposed to going to the individual's products themselves to get the logs that you're looking for.
Generation of metrics against compromised accounts based on location and time of the year. It helped in launching phishing education campaign before hitting the most vulnerable month of the year.
It helped in neutralizing vulnerable word-press sites across the campus, leading to the decrease of account compromise.
