IBM Enterprise Content Manager vs. Kofax Capture

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM ECM
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Enterprise Content Manager and Enterprise Content Management (ECM) applications enable organizations to manage all forms of content and secure secure data with respect to compliance needs. The platform enables capture, activation, sharing, analysis and governance of unstructured data to lower costs and risk while improving efficiency.N/A
Kofax Capture
Score 5.8 out of 10
N/A
Kofax Capture is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.
$3,500
per year
Pricing
IBM Enterprise Content ManagerKofax Capture
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Kofax Capture
$3,500
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM ECMKofax Capture
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Enterprise Content ManagerKofax Capture
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
IBM Enterprise Content ManagerKofax Capture
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.9 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.9 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Enterprise Content ManagerKofax Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(6 ratings)
9.2
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(6 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Enterprise Content ManagerKofax Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Again, I like to think of my association and usage of IBM Case Manager V.5.2. Please keep in mind that this is only one component of the IBM Enterprise Content Management suite of products. I believe IBM Case Manager is an ideal solution for medium to large companies looking to automate lnad
Read full review
Kofax
Kofax [Capture] meets our needs and for the most part is easy to use and setup. Configuration could be a little bit easier. The scripting language is a double edge sword if you will. It gives you nearly unlimited possibilities to script what you need, but the downside is you have to script it. Does a good job at batching and scanning documents. The tool integrates well into our workflow which makes our business partners happy and in turn provides for happy customers.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • It provides easy to use administrative tools to work with the product.
  • Good documentation on the production is available which makes it easier to use.
  • It supports high availability architecture
Read full review
Kofax
  • The VRS application included with Kofax Capture is the best image pre-processing platform available on the market today. It can handle a wide array of common document problems such as skew, flipping, wrinkles, lines, and dots.
  • The platform is incredibly scriptable and can be customized to handle all sorts of unusual document contents to allow information to be extracted that many other platforms just struggle on. Table extraction, line item matching, and smart extraction are all strong points with this platform.
  • Through the use of SBL and .NET the platform can be expanded and scaled quite easily to allow for the software to be integrated into existing business processes and platforms with ease.
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • As enterprise and mid-market systems go, the price is highly competitive (especially when you consider what's included in the license). That said, this product is not accessible for small businesses as a self hosted solution. The "Navigator on Cloud" solution is much more accessible, but gives less control over data.
  • To get all the features, there are many moving parts. For large enterprises, this is no problem, and the cloud solution obviates most of these concerns.
Read full review
Kofax
  • We struggled with configuring Kofax with AP Automation. We used to receive vouchers in different formats by different companies, by different departments. The people from different departments used to scan those vouchers through regular scanners to a central location, which ended up as image pdfs. We fed these image pdfs through Kofax Capture for character recognition, which was painful as the accuracy of recognition was 50 to 60%.
  • Having a connectors with a workflow tool would be helpful where people can validate and approve the output.
  • More samples and documentation related to use of API in .NET applications would be a good improvement, that would help users to adapt the product easily into their organization.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
There is no plan to change ECM at organizational level. Replacing products and changing custom applications involves lot of effort
Read full review
Kofax
Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
Read full review
Usability
IBM
The end-user experience is excellent. The Administration experience needs some more work.
Read full review
Kofax
It's good.
Read full review
Support Rating
IBM
No answers on this topic
Kofax
Haven't really used their support yet
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
Our relationship with IBM is long standing. We have been Gold Partners for some time and are viewed by many internal groups as their Go To partner for large ECM deployments. Most of our systems engineers hold multiple certifications as solutions developers. Our clients are national and international. The support we receive from IBM has been excellent and our partnership with them on numerous projects has been excellent.
Read full review
Kofax
Quality of data capture. Automatic data integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic image integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic invoice booking in Oracle and SAP ERP.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • We have seen our customers realize increased employee efficiency by reducing the amount of time it takes to process a transaction.
  • We have seen improvements in customer service because information can be made more readily available to customer service personnel who are fielding service calls.
  • We have seen improvements in decision making because processing-related statistics are more readily available to the managers who need the input to make quality business decisions that affect the day-to-day operations.
Read full review
Kofax
  • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
Read full review
ScreenShots