Intel Unite vs. Polycom RealPresence Group Series

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Intel Unite
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Intel Unite is a collaboration tool combining document sharing, visual collaboration, whiteboarding, and meeting space controls in a single platform.N/A
Polycom RealPresence Group Series
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
The Polycom RealPresence Group Series is a video conferencing codec that connects to a standards-based video conferencing infrastructure to allow users to make video conference calls. There are three products in the series – RealPresence Group 300, RealPresence Group 500, and RealPresence Group 700. It is certified to use with Office 365 and Skype for Business.N/A
Pricing
Intel UnitePolycom RealPresence Group Series
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Intel UnitePolycom RealPresence Group Series
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Intel UnitePolycom RealPresence Group Series
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Intel UnitePolycom RealPresence Group Series
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Intel Unite
8.0
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Polycom RealPresence Group Series
-
Ratings
Mobile Access8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Intel Unite
8.0
1 Ratings
0% below category average
Polycom RealPresence Group Series
-
Ratings
Chat8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Intel Unite
8.5
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Polycom RealPresence Group Series
-
Ratings
Document collaboration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Intel UnitePolycom RealPresence Group Series
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
Zoom Workplace
Zoom Workplace
Score 8.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.7 out of 10
Cisco Headsets
Cisco Headsets
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
Cisco Headsets
Cisco Headsets
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Intel UnitePolycom RealPresence Group Series
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.7
(26 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
Intel UnitePolycom RealPresence Group Series
Likelihood to Recommend
Intel Corporation
It's a fantastic tool [Intel Unite] in meeting rooms where staff frequently change and/or bring their own devices to connect. No more wires or dongles, just a wifi connection needed and that's it to stream to the screen. It'll even display on the screen exactly what end-users need to do to connect, which makes getting connected for less tech-savvy users very easy. If you have an IT or AV department that isn't great, this probably isn't a great option to roll-your-own, but they do sell dedicated Intel Unite PCs with everything pre-done on them.
Read full review
Poly
If you're always working in the Polycom ecosystem then the Group Series codecs are reliable and the quality of the camera and microphones are extremely good. However, the system relies heavily on either having onsite server technology and/or cloud based bridging capability. In addition, the peripherals like cameras and microphones are quite expensive. Maintenance and support costs also make the ongoing investment a costly one
Read full review
Pros
Intel Corporation
  • No dongles needed any longer for connections, it's all through a local wifi (or the corporate one depending on how you set it up). You can stream from mobile devices too.
  • Simple set-up - laptops connect very easily, mobiles connect quickly with an app.
Read full review
Poly
  • The audio and video quality can not be matched.
  • For the most part, they are rather simplistic in their use and just work. People don't usually have a hard time operating them
  • They are rather versatile in that we have been able to integrate them with other applications
Read full review
Cons
Intel Corporation
  • The initial setup was a bit of a pain - when we started they required specific hardware to make it work (Intel vPro), which wasn't on the PC used for presentations at the time and we had to change hardware out.
  • Software versions are difficult to find on the Intel website - it's a bit of a jumble and not clear as to what needs to be installed and where.
Read full review
Poly
  • The only issue that we have experienced with Polycom RealPresence Group Series is the speed dial functionality. When attempting to use the speed dial buttons, the system occasionally sends a call through the computer system, not the phone. While the computer call option is valuable, not everyone can answer calls that way and we have had to do a manual lookup of an extension and call back when that happens.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Intel Corporation
No answers on this topic
Poly
We love the product and is totally integrated in our company.
Read full review
Usability
Intel Corporation
No answers on this topic
Poly
The directory is slightly dated and unless you have a Skype for Business integration license, dialing users into a call is difficult. The Group Series Remote whilst minimalistic is actually more difficult to use than the previous HDX remote. Having to recharge the battery on the group series remote is both annoying and difficult as if you do not keep on top of it, you will be faced with a situation where the remote is not working and then have to try and find another one. Not ideal if you need to start a video call (assuming auto join has not been enabled in the admin portal).
Read full review
Support Rating
Intel Corporation
No answers on this topic
Poly
I can't say I've needed support more than a handful of times. One was for trying to connect a Polycom Conference phone and a Real Presence together. After a few months, we came to the conclusion it wasn't possible, that was the only frustrating occurance with support. Any other time if we needed to RMA a device, it was very smooth.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Intel Corporation
GoToMeeting and Webex both require either a connection to the display screen or a PC mounted to the display to connect through. [Intel] Unite handles both of those areas, though it doesn't function as a remote meeting platform to bring people together from different locations. It's just for local display.
Read full review
Poly
Polycom RealPresence Group Series stands head and shoulders above Microsoft Teams and Cisco Webex Meetings both for dependability and robust delivery of function. One established the meetings were very hard to break apart but easy to end when so desired. The installation of the devices, the training of technicians, and end-users were both intuitive and easy to manage, where the same interactions with Microsoft Teams and Cisco Webex In my opinion, and experience, were challenging to work through.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Intel Corporation
  • For us, this has been a creature comfort primarily as it has allowed us to simplify connections in meeting rooms for infrequent staff.
  • We had a lot of theft of dongles from meeting rooms due to presenters snatching them when they packed up for the day. [Intel] Unite let us allow presenters to connect wirelessly to the display screens, and no more dongles to hand out in the first place!
Read full review
Poly
  • Once pexip integrates Polycom/skype this will be a big win for us due to the RPTouch integrating the "one - touch join". This will increase adoption of video greatly.
  • Before the Group series with peripherals was implemented the cost of a video room was twice what it is today. Massive win.
  • Due to provisioning and automated firmware the IT involvement has been greatly reduced. No longer is there a need for manual changes to individual endpoints.
Read full review
ScreenShots