Jira Software vs. Zephyr Enterprise

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Jira Software
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Jira Software is a project management tool from Atlassian, featuring an interactive timeline for mapping work items, dependencies, and releases, Scrum boards for agile teams, and out-of-the-box reports and dashboards.
$81.85
per month 10 users
Zephyr Enterprise
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Zephyr Enterprise provides optimization, quality, speed, and processing of testing activities in a single tool. Other features include creating test cases, defining user requirements and generating reports.N/A
Pricing
Jira SoftwareZephyr Enterprise
Editions & Modules
Standard
$8.15
per month per user (minimum 10)
Premium
$16
per month per user (minimum 10)
Data Center
$44,000
per year 500 users
Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jira SoftwareZephyr Enterprise
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for pricing information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jira SoftwareZephyr Enterprise
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Jira SoftwareZephyr Enterprise
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Jira Software
-
Ratings
Zephyr Enterprise
9.3
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Jira SoftwareZephyr Enterprise
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.9 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Jira SoftwareZephyr Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(187 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(35 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(28 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.3
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(23 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.7
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Jira SoftwareZephyr Enterprise
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
The Jira software works well for managing scrum boards and allocating resources to a task. When your Epics and Issues are set up properly, it can give you a good idea of where your team stands and the trajectory of your project. It is not the ideal solution if you need to provide documentation and support to people outside of your product teams or organization. It would benefit from having a public documentation or repository feature.
Read full review
SmartBear
  1. Well suited for companies having several applications which need rigorous continuous testing cycles due to periodic upgrades to products/features.
  2. Ideally suited for use cases where there is a need to run sanity and regression suites very frequently.
  3. It is very helpful to have a traceability matrix across Stories/tasks and easy to link all the test cases to be covered to stories.
  4. Variety of reports for Quality Dashboard.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Running sprints and tracking progress of roadmap, epics, story, task and subtask
  • The user interface is great. It allows tables inside details, have common shortcuts and clean design.
  • Can create custom dashboards and can view data in multiple ways
  • Advanced access rights based on role
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Creation of Folders, Sub Folder and Releases for various Teams/Projects
  • Ability to create cycles and adding cases to these
  • Ability to copy/clone entire test cycles for regression/sanity needs
  • Linking of defects to Test Cases
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • Management of the software is very difficult at times, although has improved.
  • Ability to manage resources is really non-existent, there are some plugins but they are ALL buggy (I've tested them all).
  • Better integration with Trello, would love to see this happen. Right now it's very clumsy.
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Better Test case Upload Utility
  • Ability to quickly map test cases from excel to JIRA fields
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
This is because Jira Software generates a huge profit for an affordable price. Having a tool that makes team management transparent and effective is very valuable.
In addition, the renewal of Jira Software and all Atlassian tools is predictable and clear, as the prices are published on the Atlassian website and there is no pyramid of intermediaries.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Usability
Atlassian
JIRA Software is a pretty complex tool. We have a project manager for JIRA who onboarded us, created our board, and taught us the basics. I think it would have been pretty overwhelming to learn without her. JIRA offers so much functionality that I'm not aware of -- I constantly need to Google or ask others about existing features. Also, although they are all under the Atlassian umbrella, I find it difficult to switch between JIRA Software and Confluence.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Atlassian
Our JIRA support is handled internally by members of our Product Support team. It is not supported by a 3rd party. Our internal support will always sent out notifications for downtime which is usually done on the weekend unless it is required to fix a bug/issue that is affecting the entire company. Downtime is typically 3-4 hours and then once the maintenance is complete, another broadcast email is sent out informing the user community that the system is now available for use.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Atlassian
One of their strong points i stheir documentation. Almost all of the basic set up needed within JIRA is available online through atlassian and its easy to find and very precise. The more critical issues need to be addressed as well and hence the rating of 8 instead of a 9.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
Take your time implementing Jira. Make sure you understand how you want to handle your projects and workflows. Investing more time in the implementation can pay off in a long run. It basically took us 5 days to define and implement correctly, but that meant smooth sailing later on.
Read full review
SmartBear
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
Jira Software has more integrations and has more features than many of its competitors. While some of its competitors do have better UI/UX than Jira Software, they have improved this greatly over time. Atlassian also acquired Trello years ago, so that adds better user interfaces to the system. They do also offer a pretty in-depth library of how to customize the platform that others don't.
Read full review
SmartBear
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • Jira has positively made our company's daily activities much better organized
  • With Jira we can track progress and follow up on tasks
  • Jira has great reporting tools which aggregate various data and give us a good overview of our teams capacity
Read full review
SmartBear
  • Time saving and productivity enhancement for QA teams by preventing context and tool switching
  • High observability to management via QA Dashboards
Read full review
ScreenShots