Otomi Container Platform vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Otomi Container Platform
Score 0.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Otomi Container Platform is an enterprise-grade, production-ready container platform solution that acts as an added-value layer on top of Kubernetes. It's like WordPress for Kubernetes. The Otomi Container Platform is designed to make it possible to make Kubernetes Adoption a Less expensive and simple experience.
$0
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is a comprehensive service that offers fully managed OpenShift clusters, on IBM Cloud platform. It is directly integrated into the same Kubernetes service that maintains 25 billion on-demand forecasts daily at The Weather Company.N/A
Pricing
Otomi Container PlatformRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Editions & Modules
Free edition
$0
Free edition
$0
Per cluster / per month
Enterprise edition
$1,184
Per cluster / per month
Enterprise edition
$1,184
Per cluster / per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Otomi Container PlatformRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$1,184 Per cluster/ per monthNo setup fee
Additional DetailsIf the client purchases more than one cluster there are price reduction options.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Otomi Container PlatformRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Otomi Container PlatformRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Otomi Container Platform
-
Ratings
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
7.9
4 Ratings
1% above category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.64 Ratings
Container Orchestration00 Ratings8.64 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.83 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.74 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings7.84 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Otomi Container PlatformRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Small Businesses
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
AWS Elastic Beanstalk
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Otomi Container PlatformRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(13 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Otomi Container PlatformRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Kubes
No answers on this topic
IBM
RedHat OpenShift is not only suited for IBM Cloud but can run in ANY cloud. We installed in Azure Cloud, for example. It can also run on Linux servers or a Power 9 machine. It is built for multi-cloud or on-prem environments. IBM support provides such excellent guidance in the installation and configuration that no other product on the market can beat it.
Read full review
Pros
Red Kubes
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Multiclick provisioning of resources makes it super easy to manage pods and deployments. We don't have to maintain code for the same
  • In built security features and customizability ensures that organization wide standards are integrated well into the containers
  • Automated backups, scale ups and fail recovery makes sure of minimal down time
Read full review
Cons
Red Kubes
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • I wish it had better compatibility with docker file syntax. We had issues when it couldn't build standard docker files
  • Wish it had better documentation
  • Wish they offered fully supported client libraries for the Openshift API rather than dumping it on a 3rd party
Read full review
Support Rating
Red Kubes
No answers on this topic
IBM
I think response time for IBM Cloud support should be improved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Red Kubes
No answers on this topic
IBM
We evaluated a number of potential solutions and ultimately chose Red Hat OpenShift because it was compatible with our existing technology. Time and costs savings have been realized throughout the company since we implemented Red Hat OpenShift, and the IT department has been freed up to focus on activities that are more valuable.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Kubes
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Our customer satisfaction and NPS score has had positive outcomes based on new architecture
  • We are focused on business outcomes vs running the service and maintenance
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud has had a direct, positive impact on TCO, ROI, and payback period
  • Our staff is more focused on higher-level business activities, i.e. acquiring & customer retention
Read full review
ScreenShots

Otomi Container Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of Otomi Console