Responsive vs. Windward Core

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Responsive
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Responsive (formerly RFPIO), headquartered in Beaverton, offers their proposal management and automation software, featuring import and export, proposal knowledgebase and answer library, evaluation intake forms, and project management tools (e.g. Gantt chart) associated to proposal tracking.N/A
Windward Core
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Windward’s low-code document generation solution embeds into any application, enabling users to populate data-smart documents within the familiar landscape of Microsoft Office. It's a solution from PDFTron since the April 2021 acquisition.
$190
per month
Pricing
ResponsiveWindward Core
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Windward Hub Standard
$19.00
Per User, Per Month (10 user minimum)*
Windward Hub Premium
$49.00
Per User, Per Month (10 user minimum)*
Windward Core Pro
$547.00
per month*
Windward Core Flex
$605.00
per month*
Windward Hub Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ResponsiveWindward Core
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details*Pay annually: 15% discount 10% discount for quarterly payment of Windward Core.
More Pricing Information
Features
ResponsiveWindward Core
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Responsive
7.7
17 Ratings
3% below category average
Windward Core
-
Ratings
Proposal branding8.111 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal templates5.514 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal content library updates9.117 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided proposal creation8.19 Ratings00 Ratings
Searchable proposal database7.417 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Responsive
7.6
17 Ratings
6% below category average
Windward Core
-
Ratings
RFP management & response8.217 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval8.216 Ratings00 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls9.116 Ratings00 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow6.211 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface6.316 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Responsive
8.1
13 Ratings
2% above category average
Windward Core
-
Ratings
Proposal distribution8.110 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive proposals8.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Proposal content tracking8.111 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ResponsiveWindward Core
Small Businesses
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.2 out of 10
Jotform
Jotform
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.2 out of 10
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 7.9 out of 10
Conga Composer
Conga Composer
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ResponsiveWindward Core
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(18 ratings)
9.1
(25 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(16 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(16 ratings)
Support Rating
9.8
(16 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ResponsiveWindward Core
Likelihood to Recommend
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
1. RFPIO is perfect for searching for specific information when you are responding to an RFP. Search engine is powerful. We narrow our search using several customized filters and know we are getting a thorough search. 2. Excel responses work very well in RFPIO. 3. Typical RFPs that are formatted in Word are challenging to run via RFPIO. We struggle with this. 4. We have yet to master the template.
Read full review
Apryse
Great for Technical Users. It's great for people a bit more on the technical side. It allows developers to quickly create and modify reporting templates without having to modify source code or make updates to a repository. Potentially Difficult for Non-Technical Users. Making substantial changes to the data portions of reporting can be a bit difficult for non-technical users. While Windward's tools for this are great, it still requires an understanding of the database schema which not all users will have.
Read full review
Pros
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Live collaboration - the ability for multiple experts to simultaneously work on the same RFP.
  • Artificial intelligence - the ability for the product to continually learn what the best answers are and serve them up to our teams.
  • Dynamic branding - the ability for custom brand different templates by vertical, line of business, local branding, etc. with seamless transition.
  • Content review & moderation - the ability for our national content team to bulk review, edit and share content with our teams in a methodical way.
Read full review
Apryse
  • Native Office output -- not nested tables and/or horrible RTF like other tools generate.
  • Ease of use -- once the data sources are set up, creating tables is as simple as drag and drop (okay, maybe not exactly that simple, but you can certainly create a table of data using drag and drop, then format it and manipulate it as needed).
  • Responsive developers and support -- when I've had questions, they've been addressed VERY quickly and professionally.
Read full review
Cons
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Reporting and Analytics is basic, you can purchase advanced analytics though
  • It would have been nice to have a set structure in mind or a example/case study to structure our responses in the most appropriate way, but we are working through that with their stellar support team
  • Really great new features, but expensive
Read full review
Apryse
  • It is hard to pick out the tags if they are mixed in with a block of text.
  • Using report variables in select statements causes the selection list of available fields to not show anything.
  • The color themes do not match the office selection and it feels very disconnected.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
UI is friendly. Basically that alone is enough to renew because it is easy to use and gives accurate and fast results. The effective cross collaboration from other colleagues in my organization also makes for this tool to be extremely effective. Now that I understand how to use it, I can also easily train others on how to use it effectively.
Read full review
Apryse
No answers on this topic
Usability
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
No answers on this topic
Apryse
For the most part, the Windward report designer is intuitive for our users; but there are a few areas where it is less intuitive. In these cases, our users need to search Windwards support wiki site, or even contact their support technicians. This can also be due to the short time we've had Windward and our lack of knowledge.
Read full review
Support Rating
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
The team at RFPIO is extremely responsive. If I email our account manager or report a bug, I usually hear back within two hours. Additionally, they are quick to make software adjustments based on customer requests and needs. We had a really complicated Excel sheet that their team ended up having to upload for me because of the amount of manual work I was doing. Based on that, they updated the software within two release cycles to make the process more automated, so that future Excel uploads would be more streamlined. I have also had several suggestions implemented rather quickly, and they don't hesitate to reach out for clarification when needed.
Read full review
Apryse
Support is something they take pride in. Once an issue is raised, they are quick to respond and provide details on a fix. No complaints on support here.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
We were able to complete an RFP during our free trial. We were already leaning toward RFPIO but that pushed us over the edge.
Read full review
Apryse
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
RFPIO has outstanding, responsive, helpful customer support located in the US in Oregon. Support techs go the extra mile to help with basic issues and functionality training. Same-day support response and problem resolution are the norms. The system is also very user-friendly and very easy to navigate. Their Answer library is simple and far less complex than Qvidian/Inland. Little to no learning curve.
Read full review
Apryse
We evaluated several other products to integrate with our new software, but Windward Studios was an obvious standout above the majority. Other applications required some level of software development knowledge and experience to create templates and a much steeper learning curve. After consideration of ease of use, as well as a cost-comparison between different products, Windward Studios was the most suitable product to meet our needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • I don't have access to the actual ROI data, but we would continue to invest in RFPIO as a company only if it were providing us with the results to win RFPs.
  • RFPIO makes the task of filling out RFP responses much faster for me.
  • RFPIO helps our team be able to divide out RFP chores easily, because we know we all have access to the same high-quality source for information.
Read full review
Apryse
  • As a fully integrated solution, the ROI is impacted when a client gets stickier with our solution because they see the benefit of Windward.
  • Support has been fantastic for our development team so that as we integrate the solutions we have a clear and clean design.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Windward Core Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of