TrustRadius

Screenster vs. SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Screenster
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Screenster is a low-code solution for web UI testing automation. Along with the full support of Selenium and JavaScript, this tool features rich functionality for codeless test authoring and editing. Screenster enables robust automation of visual UI testing with self-healing locators, DOM and content recognition, and automatic waits.N/A
SoapUI Open Source
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
SoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.N/A
Pricing
ScreensterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ScreensterSoapUI Open Source
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ScreensterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
ScreensterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.6 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprises
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.6 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ScreensterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
ScreensterSoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend
Screenster
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
Good for simple requests, simple scripts, assertions, and small workflows. Also not bad with the Open Source version if savvy with code as you can do a lot with custom functionality.Free version has limited compatibility with scripts/projects created from the Pro version, but functionality-wise can probably be made up with coding. As such, the free version may not be too suitable for complex scripts or for those who are not familiar with coding as functionality/usability may be limited.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
Screenster
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • Ease of implementation
  • Ease of use
  • User friendly interface
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
Screenster
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services.
Abraham García | TrustRadius Reviewer
Abraham García
Web Development Manager
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Screenster
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman. Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not. For Rest API, I think that Postman is a little above SoapUI, but not too far away.
JD
Read full review
Return on Investment
Screenster
No answers on this topic
SmartBear
  • Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases.
  • User friendliness of the app makes it good.
  • Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing.
Ajay Kumar | TrustRadius Reviewer
Ajay Kumar
Software Developer
Read full review
ScreenShots